<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Every Day is 1956&#8243;: The Hungarian Revolution Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/</link>
	<description>Author James Bovard</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saturdaynightspecial</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6696</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturdaynightspecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6696</guid>
		<description>quote from Gorka"
"Imagine an American president celebrating the Fourth of July in front of the Capitol with a spattering of foreign guests and a few handpicked kids on bikes in a little parody of a parade, with a solitary fire truck for good measure. A police cordon forms a vast circle in order to keep ordinary Americans from getting closer than a mile. Imagine that an American president did this not on any ordinary July 4th, but on the Bicentennial. Indeed, it’s rather more like Orwell than a democracy at the start of the 21st century." [Gorka]

Bush did that here when he was inaguarated - reminded me of Red Square.

Jim your post was timely, interesting and appropriate. Our country is like Hungary in many ways. We trend towards excessive socialism and we need to stop it. There are many nazi lovers born here in America every day. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote from Gorka&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Imagine an American president celebrating the Fourth of July in front of the Capitol with a spattering of foreign guests and a few handpicked kids on bikes in a little parody of a parade, with a solitary fire truck for good measure. A police cordon forms a vast circle in order to keep ordinary Americans from getting closer than a mile. Imagine that an American president did this not on any ordinary July 4th, but on the Bicentennial. Indeed, it’s rather more like Orwell than a democracy at the start of the 21st century.&#8221; [Gorka]</p>
<p>Bush did that here when he was inaguarated - reminded me of Red Square.</p>
<p>Jim your post was timely, interesting and appropriate. Our country is like Hungary in many ways. We trend towards excessive socialism and we need to stop it. There are many nazi lovers born here in America every day. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kmet</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6552</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6552</guid>
		<description>Jim this is a quote from the article in NYT:"a far-right party that once made Western Europe shudder now a part of the Slovakian government". Is that all they can come with? Name calling and using deaply dark colored words? Like "Fangs", "shudder" and on and on. No substance, just plain style?

Slovaks have problem with immage because they have three powerfull enemies, two of them being their former masters in Budapest and Praque, whom still can not take the independent Slovakia and the last one are Jews, whom claim that Slovaks mistreated them in the first Slovak Republic in 1939-1945. While I admit that treatment of Jews in those years was a huge shame on Slovaks and I personally feel badly for that, Magyars and Czechs do not have any such a claim against Slovaks, except some wild wet dreams of lost dominance over them. 

In Slovakia there are two nationalistic parties: Slovak National Party and Magyar (Hungarian) National Coalition. While you may find it strange that in one nation can be two nationalistic political parties it is nevertheles true. I find it zany too - Hungarian coalition is akin to have Mexican Natioanl Party active in USA with only goal - to get back to Mexico what used to be Mexican - California, New Mexico and I do not know what else (sorry). Magyar (Hungarian) coalition is openly irredentist and was part of Slovak government from 1998 until now. Europe then was happy and content and you did not read that it would be "shuddering".  Why not??? Why suddenly whole western Europe shudder when Slovak National Party comes to the government of Slovakia. Not Hungary Jim, but Slovakia.  They do not shudder from neo-nazi party winning regional election in Germany, but they definitelly shudder from tiny Slovakia. I find it definitely strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim this is a quote from the article in NYT:&#8221;a far-right party that once made Western Europe shudder now a part of the Slovakian government&#8221;. Is that all they can come with? Name calling and using deaply dark colored words? Like &#8220;Fangs&#8221;, &#8220;shudder&#8221; and on and on. No substance, just plain style?</p>
<p>Slovaks have problem with immage because they have three powerfull enemies, two of them being their former masters in Budapest and Praque, whom still can not take the independent Slovakia and the last one are Jews, whom claim that Slovaks mistreated them in the first Slovak Republic in 1939-1945. While I admit that treatment of Jews in those years was a huge shame on Slovaks and I personally feel badly for that, Magyars and Czechs do not have any such a claim against Slovaks, except some wild wet dreams of lost dominance over them. </p>
<p>In Slovakia there are two nationalistic parties: Slovak National Party and Magyar (Hungarian) National Coalition. While you may find it strange that in one nation can be two nationalistic political parties it is nevertheles true. I find it zany too - Hungarian coalition is akin to have Mexican Natioanl Party active in USA with only goal - to get back to Mexico what used to be Mexican - California, New Mexico and I do not know what else (sorry). Magyar (Hungarian) coalition is openly irredentist and was part of Slovak government from 1998 until now. Europe then was happy and content and you did not read that it would be &#8220;shuddering&#8221;.  Why not??? Why suddenly whole western Europe shudder when Slovak National Party comes to the government of Slovakia. Not Hungary Jim, but Slovakia.  They do not shudder from neo-nazi party winning regional election in Germany, but they definitelly shudder from tiny Slovakia. I find it definitely strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chaihorsky</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chaihorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>The point is - when Hungarians (or Americans or Brits or Russians or Germans (especially Germans) behave badly we are all free to criticise them and take them apart.  But not the Jews.
And as one, I detest this because that just invites more crooks of Jewish origin come to business and make Jewish boys who wants to become scientists, engineers, writers and yes, ubiquotous doctors, feel that they are stupid by obiding the rules. 
I say - we should be (and badly need it too) criticised and ridiculed for bad behaviour as much as anyone else.
Your comment that Jews were killed in Hungary well before Communism is irrelevant. My argument had nothing to do with the Communism per se, but with the tendencies of certain groups percieved by the majority of population to be "foreign" to occupy the strategic positions of power and influence. If such a group, being percieved as foreign by culture, or blood or religion  does not pay attention to the will of the native population the conflict will start. And the results vary from USA (brutal ethnic cleansing and isolation of native peoples into reservations and oblivion) to Ruanda - total and brutal ethnic cleansing of the "foreign" element.

IMHO - the Jewish elite in Hungaria, similar non-native, (not necceserily Jewsih) elites in Russia (among which I have personal friends), etc have to be very careful in how they use their influence, power and panache. They will always be look at by natives with caution and suspicion. And if they stumble, they better be prepared to silently go away, because natives see them as expensive and diva-like employee administrators, and reserve the right to fire them at such times. If they see a resistance to such firing they interpret it as a seizure of power and stealing their land from them.
That is when the centuries of civilization wash away and the proud barbarian Hunn pick up the mace.
Which is bad for everyone including the Hunns themselves. That is how fascism starts.  
Intellectuals, social engineers, international bankers and young and restless political advisors to the office of US President - beware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is - when Hungarians (or Americans or Brits or Russians or Germans (especially Germans) behave badly we are all free to criticise them and take them apart.  But not the Jews.<br />
And as one, I detest this because that just invites more crooks of Jewish origin come to business and make Jewish boys who wants to become scientists, engineers, writers and yes, ubiquotous doctors, feel that they are stupid by obiding the rules.<br />
I say - we should be (and badly need it too) criticised and ridiculed for bad behaviour as much as anyone else.<br />
Your comment that Jews were killed in Hungary well before Communism is irrelevant. My argument had nothing to do with the Communism per se, but with the tendencies of certain groups percieved by the majority of population to be &#8220;foreign&#8221; to occupy the strategic positions of power and influence. If such a group, being percieved as foreign by culture, or blood or religion  does not pay attention to the will of the native population the conflict will start. And the results vary from USA (brutal ethnic cleansing and isolation of native peoples into reservations and oblivion) to Ruanda - total and brutal ethnic cleansing of the &#8220;foreign&#8221; element.</p>
<p>IMHO - the Jewish elite in Hungaria, similar non-native, (not necceserily Jewsih) elites in Russia (among which I have personal friends), etc have to be very careful in how they use their influence, power and panache. They will always be look at by natives with caution and suspicion. And if they stumble, they better be prepared to silently go away, because natives see them as expensive and diva-like employee administrators, and reserve the right to fire them at such times. If they see a resistance to such firing they interpret it as a seizure of power and stealing their land from them.<br />
That is when the centuries of civilization wash away and the proud barbarian Hunn pick up the mace.<br />
Which is bad for everyone including the Hunns themselves. That is how fascism starts.<br />
Intellectuals, social engineers, international bankers and young and restless political advisors to the office of US President - beware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; had a piece today on the situation in Hungary and East Europe. I suspect some of the commentors here might disagree with a few passages in this article. (Thanks to the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.karmalised.com/archives/001716.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;karmalised blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; for the material &#038; a link back to this fray)   The New York Times is not the final authority, but perhaps the piece is of interest.
&lt;strong&gt;Backlash to 'velvet' revolutions&lt;/strong&gt;
By Craig S. Smith
30 October 2006 The New York Times

BUDAPEST: Skinheads rioting in the streets of Budapest, populist twins running Poland and a far-right party that once made Western Europe shudder now a part of the Slovakian government. What is happening to central Europe?

Well into their second decade since the collapse of communism, many of Europe's newest democracies are struggling with weak governments and polarized societies and worrying their Western neighbors that they may become the problem children of the European Union.

"For 10 years, all of these countries had to go through very radical reforms and natural conflicts were suppressed because there was an overriding objective to join the European Union," said Jiri Pehe, a political analyst and a past adviser to the Czech Republic's former president, Vaclav Havel, in Prague. "Some of the things that should have played out are now coming to the surface."

That pattern was on full display last week when rightist, nationalist demonstrators clashed with the police, hijacking what was to have been a solemn commemoration of Hungary's failed 1956 uprising against Soviet domination a half century ago.

The triggers for the unrest were relatively mundane: heavy handed efforts by the police to control protesters incensed by a recently leaked tape recording of Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany admitting that he had lied to the public about the economy to win elections in April.

But there is something more fundamental going on. Many people in central and eastern Europe never had a say in the massive upheaval of 1989 when "velvet" revolutions dismantled the communist regimes of the former Soviet bloc, and many feel that they have suffered as a result.

"It was a negotiated revolution, and that limited the people's participation in creating the new system," said Istvan Stumpf, a political analyst and former minister in the Hungarian government. "Most people describe themselves as losers in the change of systems and in joining the EU."

The region has been swept by a strong nationalistic impulse that is being promoted and exploited by populist politicians.

It began in Poland, where the conservative Law and Justice party won elections last year. The twin brothers Lech and Jaroslaw Kaczynski, now the country's president and prime minister respectively, have alienated much of the obsessively tolerant EU with their conservative Catholic, anti-homosexual attitudes and talk of Poland's assuming its "rightful" place on the Continent's political map.

The Kaczynski's choice of coalition partners has not helped: the League of Polish Families, representing the country's religious right, and Self Defense, led by a populist potato farmer.

In Slovakia, meanwhile, the nominally left-leaning Smer party formed a coalition of its own with two far-right parties: the ultranationalist Slovak National Party and the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia, led by Vladimir Meciar, whose autocratic style partly isolated the country from Western Europe while he was prime minister in the mid-1990s.

Even the Czech Republic has been touched by the trend: It has had no real government since June elections left it with a deadlocked Parliament that is deeply and near evenly divided between right and left.

"In all of these countries, reformers and populists are fighting each other," said Krisztian Szabados, director of the research organization, Political Capital, based in Budapest.

The rise in nationalism has reinvigorated old regional feuds, particularly between Hungary and its neighbors over the treatment of ethnic Hungarians living in land that once was part of greater Hungary.

Some of the Hungarian rioters last week carried the red-and-white striped flag of the medieval Arpad dynasty, which gave Hungary its first kings. The flag has become an emblem of Hungarian nationalists in recent years, but many people see it as an ominous reference to Hungary's fascist Arrow Cross party, which adopted the flag during its brief 1940s reign of terror.

"We reject the Treaty of Trianon," said a young man who gave his name as Gergo, carrying an Arpad flag last week amid a small crowd of protesters outside this country's huge, neo-gothic parliament building. He was referring to the post-World War I treaty that dismembered Hungary and left it a third of its original size. His sweatshirt was emblazoned with a map showing the borders of Hungary before and after World War I.

"The so-called Christian middle class with roots in regions taken away from Hungary by the Treaty of Trianon believe in their historic right to govern the country, compared to 'non-Hungarians,' of Jewish, Austrian or German heritage whose capital has financed our modernization," Gyurcsany said during a meeting with foreign reporters in the Parliament building last week. "References to 'the will of the people' are nothing more than an expression of this nationalist right as opposed to republican ideals."

The nationalist trend is being marshaled by Viktor Orban, a former prime minister and leader of Fidesz, the country's main opposition party. He has led calls for Gyrucsany's resignation and has held a series of rallies that have drawn tens of thousands of protesters into the streets.

He denies that his party has had anything to do with the far-right fringe that has been responsible for the recent violence, but analysts say that his appeal to the far right has been deliberate. For years, Orban has tried to capture all of the country's rightist voters, no matter how radical, in hopes of winning a rare majority in Parliament.

The strategy has drawn votes away from the country's small far-right parties, which failed to win the minimum 5 percent necessary for parliamentary representation in the latest elections. Without a party to represent them, analysts say, the ultraconservative right has taken to the streets, encouraged by Orban's massive anti-government rallies.

"Orban is now one of the most dangerous populists in the region because he's the most successful," said Szabados.

But Fidesz party leaders say that the real problem is that Gyurcsany is ignoring the will of the people.

"Gyurcsany is playing with fire," said Janos Ader, a Fidesz Parliament member and deputy speaker of Parliament. "This government is hurting more and more sectors of society and sooner or later these people will go into the streets,"

The opposition party has proposed a referendum for next year that they hope would block some of the unpopular changes that Gyurcsany has vowed to push through, including new fees for university and doctor's visits. Gyurcsany says the changes are a necessary part of a larger program to reduce government spending and rein in the country's budget deficit, which at 10.1 percent is one of the largest in Europe, so that the country can adopt the euro as its national currency in the coming years.

"In western democracies where the political culture is more advanced, politicians find a way to reach a consensus and put aside their differences and form coalitions and talk to each other," Pehe said.

"But central European political culture is still very much rooted in communist times."

"It's a Bolshevik mentality," he said. "Your opponent is your enemy and you try to destroy him. There is no culture of dialogue."

The populist drift appears at a time when the EU is weaker than it has been in years, its focus blurred by the influx of new members and its failure to win support for a European constitution last year. But most analysts believe that the EU is still strong enough to tame the trend.

"Brussels sets the limits and though politicians in the region hit back, it's out of the question that any of these countries would pull out of the EU," Szabados said. "Populists may come to power but after a while they will fail because their policies don't fit in a global economy."

Pehe said that under different historical conditions, all of this could go very badly, as it did before World War II when there were nascent democracies that collapsed into authoritarian regimes. But he added that European Union membership has all but eliminated that threat.

"The international environment here in Europe at this stage is so conducive to democracy building, it is basically almost impossible for these nations to get out of this framework," he said. "It would be economically disastrous for them. Populist leaders can only go so far."

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/29/news/hungary.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>New York Times</em> had a piece today on the situation in Hungary and East Europe. I suspect some of the commentors here might disagree with a few passages in this article. (Thanks to the <strong><a href="http://www.karmalised.com/archives/001716.html" rel="nofollow">karmalised blog</a></strong> for the material &#038; a link back to this fray)   The New York Times is not the final authority, but perhaps the piece is of interest.<br />
<strong>Backlash to &#8216;velvet&#8217; revolutions</strong><br />
By Craig S. Smith<br />
30 October 2006 The New York Times</p>
<p>BUDAPEST: Skinheads rioting in the streets of Budapest, populist twins running Poland and a far-right party that once made Western Europe shudder now a part of the Slovakian government. What is happening to central Europe?</p>
<p>Well into their second decade since the collapse of communism, many of Europe&#8217;s newest democracies are struggling with weak governments and polarized societies and worrying their Western neighbors that they may become the problem children of the European Union.</p>
<p>&#8220;For 10 years, all of these countries had to go through very radical reforms and natural conflicts were suppressed because there was an overriding objective to join the European Union,&#8221; said Jiri Pehe, a political analyst and a past adviser to the Czech Republic&#8217;s former president, Vaclav Havel, in Prague. &#8220;Some of the things that should have played out are now coming to the surface.&#8221;</p>
<p>That pattern was on full display last week when rightist, nationalist demonstrators clashed with the police, hijacking what was to have been a solemn commemoration of Hungary&#8217;s failed 1956 uprising against Soviet domination a half century ago.</p>
<p>The triggers for the unrest were relatively mundane: heavy handed efforts by the police to control protesters incensed by a recently leaked tape recording of Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany admitting that he had lied to the public about the economy to win elections in April.</p>
<p>But there is something more fundamental going on. Many people in central and eastern Europe never had a say in the massive upheaval of 1989 when &#8220;velvet&#8221; revolutions dismantled the communist regimes of the former Soviet bloc, and many feel that they have suffered as a result.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was a negotiated revolution, and that limited the people&#8217;s participation in creating the new system,&#8221; said Istvan Stumpf, a political analyst and former minister in the Hungarian government. &#8220;Most people describe themselves as losers in the change of systems and in joining the EU.&#8221;</p>
<p>The region has been swept by a strong nationalistic impulse that is being promoted and exploited by populist politicians.</p>
<p>It began in Poland, where the conservative Law and Justice party won elections last year. The twin brothers Lech and Jaroslaw Kaczynski, now the country&#8217;s president and prime minister respectively, have alienated much of the obsessively tolerant EU with their conservative Catholic, anti-homosexual attitudes and talk of Poland&#8217;s assuming its &#8220;rightful&#8221; place on the Continent&#8217;s political map.</p>
<p>The Kaczynski&#8217;s choice of coalition partners has not helped: the League of Polish Families, representing the country&#8217;s religious right, and Self Defense, led by a populist potato farmer.</p>
<p>In Slovakia, meanwhile, the nominally left-leaning Smer party formed a coalition of its own with two far-right parties: the ultranationalist Slovak National Party and the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia, led by Vladimir Meciar, whose autocratic style partly isolated the country from Western Europe while he was prime minister in the mid-1990s.</p>
<p>Even the Czech Republic has been touched by the trend: It has had no real government since June elections left it with a deadlocked Parliament that is deeply and near evenly divided between right and left.</p>
<p>&#8220;In all of these countries, reformers and populists are fighting each other,&#8221; said Krisztian Szabados, director of the research organization, Political Capital, based in Budapest.</p>
<p>The rise in nationalism has reinvigorated old regional feuds, particularly between Hungary and its neighbors over the treatment of ethnic Hungarians living in land that once was part of greater Hungary.</p>
<p>Some of the Hungarian rioters last week carried the red-and-white striped flag of the medieval Arpad dynasty, which gave Hungary its first kings. The flag has become an emblem of Hungarian nationalists in recent years, but many people see it as an ominous reference to Hungary&#8217;s fascist Arrow Cross party, which adopted the flag during its brief 1940s reign of terror.</p>
<p>&#8220;We reject the Treaty of Trianon,&#8221; said a young man who gave his name as Gergo, carrying an Arpad flag last week amid a small crowd of protesters outside this country&#8217;s huge, neo-gothic parliament building. He was referring to the post-World War I treaty that dismembered Hungary and left it a third of its original size. His sweatshirt was emblazoned with a map showing the borders of Hungary before and after World War I.</p>
<p>&#8220;The so-called Christian middle class with roots in regions taken away from Hungary by the Treaty of Trianon believe in their historic right to govern the country, compared to &#8216;non-Hungarians,&#8217; of Jewish, Austrian or German heritage whose capital has financed our modernization,&#8221; Gyurcsany said during a meeting with foreign reporters in the Parliament building last week. &#8220;References to &#8216;the will of the people&#8217; are nothing more than an expression of this nationalist right as opposed to republican ideals.&#8221;</p>
<p>The nationalist trend is being marshaled by Viktor Orban, a former prime minister and leader of Fidesz, the country&#8217;s main opposition party. He has led calls for Gyrucsany&#8217;s resignation and has held a series of rallies that have drawn tens of thousands of protesters into the streets.</p>
<p>He denies that his party has had anything to do with the far-right fringe that has been responsible for the recent violence, but analysts say that his appeal to the far right has been deliberate. For years, Orban has tried to capture all of the country&#8217;s rightist voters, no matter how radical, in hopes of winning a rare majority in Parliament.</p>
<p>The strategy has drawn votes away from the country&#8217;s small far-right parties, which failed to win the minimum 5 percent necessary for parliamentary representation in the latest elections. Without a party to represent them, analysts say, the ultraconservative right has taken to the streets, encouraged by Orban&#8217;s massive anti-government rallies.</p>
<p>&#8220;Orban is now one of the most dangerous populists in the region because he&#8217;s the most successful,&#8221; said Szabados.</p>
<p>But Fidesz party leaders say that the real problem is that Gyurcsany is ignoring the will of the people.</p>
<p>&#8220;Gyurcsany is playing with fire,&#8221; said Janos Ader, a Fidesz Parliament member and deputy speaker of Parliament. &#8220;This government is hurting more and more sectors of society and sooner or later these people will go into the streets,&#8221;</p>
<p>The opposition party has proposed a referendum for next year that they hope would block some of the unpopular changes that Gyurcsany has vowed to push through, including new fees for university and doctor&#8217;s visits. Gyurcsany says the changes are a necessary part of a larger program to reduce government spending and rein in the country&#8217;s budget deficit, which at 10.1 percent is one of the largest in Europe, so that the country can adopt the euro as its national currency in the coming years.</p>
<p>&#8220;In western democracies where the political culture is more advanced, politicians find a way to reach a consensus and put aside their differences and form coalitions and talk to each other,&#8221; Pehe said.</p>
<p>&#8220;But central European political culture is still very much rooted in communist times.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a Bolshevik mentality,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Your opponent is your enemy and you try to destroy him. There is no culture of dialogue.&#8221;</p>
<p>The populist drift appears at a time when the EU is weaker than it has been in years, its focus blurred by the influx of new members and its failure to win support for a European constitution last year. But most analysts believe that the EU is still strong enough to tame the trend.</p>
<p>&#8220;Brussels sets the limits and though politicians in the region hit back, it&#8217;s out of the question that any of these countries would pull out of the EU,&#8221; Szabados said. &#8220;Populists may come to power but after a while they will fail because their policies don&#8217;t fit in a global economy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pehe said that under different historical conditions, all of this could go very badly, as it did before World War II when there were nascent democracies that collapsed into authoritarian regimes. But he added that European Union membership has all but eliminated that threat.</p>
<p>&#8220;The international environment here in Europe at this stage is so conducive to democracy building, it is basically almost impossible for these nations to get out of this framework,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It would be economically disastrous for them. Populist leaders can only go so far.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/29/news/hungary.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/29/news/hungary.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ries</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6531</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6531</guid>
		<description>I think the previous writer is referring to the mass murders perpetrated by the Communists, a large majority of whom were Jews, beginning with the infamous Kuhn Bela govenment in the Spring of 1919 and reaching a crescendo with the post-WWII Communist Rakosi-Gero regime.
    Due to the close identification of Communism with Jews at that time, it comes as no surprise that the Hungarian people, like many Eastern Europeans who suffered under Communism, developed a general distrust of Jews in general, the results of which, unfortunately, may have led to the killing of innocents during the '56 uprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the previous writer is referring to the mass murders perpetrated by the Communists, a large majority of whom were Jews, beginning with the infamous Kuhn Bela govenment in the Spring of 1919 and reaching a crescendo with the post-WWII Communist Rakosi-Gero regime.<br />
    Due to the close identification of Communism with Jews at that time, it comes as no surprise that the Hungarian people, like many Eastern Europeans who suffered under Communism, developed a general distrust of Jews in general, the results of which, unfortunately, may have led to the killing of innocents during the &#8216;56 uprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>The mass killings of Hungarian Jews occurred years before the  communists came to power in Hungary. 

Barbarism is barbarism, and expo facto rationales do nothing to expunge the crimes or the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mass killings of Hungarian Jews occurred years before the  communists came to power in Hungary. </p>
<p>Barbarism is barbarism, and expo facto rationales do nothing to expunge the crimes or the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chaihorsky</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chaihorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>When will we start looking the truth right to the eye?
A religious or ethnic group is perfectly capable of monopolizing or near monopolizing parts of a society power structure be that finances, military or political elite or , somethimes, a cokmbination. If this group is Tutsies or Sunnis its OK to discuss the issue, if the group is Jews - its a crime.
As a Jew I detest this. The 20 century saw huge influence of Jews all over Europe in bringing socialist and communist ideas into the mainstream. In Russia, where I came from, in Poland, in Hungary, in Germany. It just so happened that Marxism completely mesmerized Jewish intellectuals all over the world (including America). So I am not surprised that in Hungary Jewish groups constituted the center of socilaist circles. And since this never worked - they were failing. And as they were failing they were lying (reminds me of our glorious administration of illustrious Dubya, our beloved C-student C-c-c-r-r-rusader!)
And because they cannot afford the gargantuan spinning machine that spans both coasts here, there were caught. And angry Hungarian crowds, being hungry Hunns, that they are (and rightfully proud of their glorious past) told them who they think they are.
Antisemitism? I steal your baby's milk, but you cannot call me a Jew thief?
Ridiculous and outrageous. The fact of someone being Jewish may be irrelevant in a domestic crime, but when a well known connection of a certain group and a certain failed ideology that was responsible for probably most monstrous crimes against humanity as in killing tens of millions of humans in Stalin's Gulags, is well established, using that connection as a weapon against failing and hated regime is in my opinion - a legitimate issue.
That is the democracy in its raw form. Its time to look it in the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will we start looking the truth right to the eye?<br />
A religious or ethnic group is perfectly capable of monopolizing or near monopolizing parts of a society power structure be that finances, military or political elite or , somethimes, a cokmbination. If this group is Tutsies or Sunnis its OK to discuss the issue, if the group is Jews - its a crime.<br />
As a Jew I detest this. The 20 century saw huge influence of Jews all over Europe in bringing socialist and communist ideas into the mainstream. In Russia, where I came from, in Poland, in Hungary, in Germany. It just so happened that Marxism completely mesmerized Jewish intellectuals all over the world (including America). So I am not surprised that in Hungary Jewish groups constituted the center of socilaist circles. And since this never worked - they were failing. And as they were failing they were lying (reminds me of our glorious administration of illustrious Dubya, our beloved C-student C-c-c-r-r-rusader!)<br />
And because they cannot afford the gargantuan spinning machine that spans both coasts here, there were caught. And angry Hungarian crowds, being hungry Hunns, that they are (and rightfully proud of their glorious past) told them who they think they are.<br />
Antisemitism? I steal your baby&#8217;s milk, but you cannot call me a Jew thief?<br />
Ridiculous and outrageous. The fact of someone being Jewish may be irrelevant in a domestic crime, but when a well known connection of a certain group and a certain failed ideology that was responsible for probably most monstrous crimes against humanity as in killing tens of millions of humans in Stalin&#8217;s Gulags, is well established, using that connection as a weapon against failing and hated regime is in my opinion - a legitimate issue.<br />
That is the democracy in its raw form. Its time to look it in the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ries</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6506</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6506</guid>
		<description>The vast gap between the cultural achievements of the Hungarians and their surrounding neighbors has served to create more than a little discord over the centuries. Given this obvious fact, along with Hungary's unenviable geographic position surrounded by militarily more powerful states eager to plunder what the Magyars had managed to build up through time, it comes as no surprise that whenever the Hungarian people attempt to rise up against their oppressors in their inimmitable, uncompromising fashion, certain groups and individuals will try to resurrect the specter of, you guessed it, Fascism, Naziism, anti-semitism, magyarization, or whatever the nicities of groupthink require at the moment. Nobody ever said it was easy being a Hungarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vast gap between the cultural achievements of the Hungarians and their surrounding neighbors has served to create more than a little discord over the centuries. Given this obvious fact, along with Hungary&#8217;s unenviable geographic position surrounded by militarily more powerful states eager to plunder what the Magyars had managed to build up through time, it comes as no surprise that whenever the Hungarian people attempt to rise up against their oppressors in their inimmitable, uncompromising fashion, certain groups and individuals will try to resurrect the specter of, you guessed it, Fascism, Naziism, anti-semitism, magyarization, or whatever the nicities of groupthink require at the moment. Nobody ever said it was easy being a Hungarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kmet</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>Jim, nothing is easy with Hungarians. Two hundred years ago they started very virulent strain of nationalism. They were responsible for "Magyarisation" - etnic cleaning in all but the name. They forced Serbs, Croats, Ukrainians and Slovaks to use Magyar (Hungarian) language. They were even forcibly taking hundreds and hundreds of Slovak kids away from home to the re-educational camps in today's Hungary, where they were kept until they become Magyars (Hungarians). Even the two aforementioned "Hungarian" heroes Lajos Kossuth and Sandor Petofi were born Slovaks.

Today's demos in Budapest are more about the zest for power of nationalistic Fidesz headed by former Prime Minister Viktor Orban and of the wide spectrum of ultra-nationalistic groups and parties, then about the freedom. Viktor Orban is a man who proclaimed that he was a Prime Minister of all Magyars - something akin to Mr. Fox in Mexico claiming the same for Mexicanos - even if living in California or New Mexico. According to media the very same claimed to be for Serbs late Milisevic. Magyars are again not only under their Nyilas Party banner but waving with maps of their pre-Trianon Hungary and proclaiming rather death then abandonment of their Great Hungary. It is pure hatred at the streets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, nothing is easy with Hungarians. Two hundred years ago they started very virulent strain of nationalism. They were responsible for &#8220;Magyarisation&#8221; - etnic cleaning in all but the name. They forced Serbs, Croats, Ukrainians and Slovaks to use Magyar (Hungarian) language. They were even forcibly taking hundreds and hundreds of Slovak kids away from home to the re-educational camps in today&#8217;s Hungary, where they were kept until they become Magyars (Hungarians). Even the two aforementioned &#8220;Hungarian&#8221; heroes Lajos Kossuth and Sandor Petofi were born Slovaks.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s demos in Budapest are more about the zest for power of nationalistic Fidesz headed by former Prime Minister Viktor Orban and of the wide spectrum of ultra-nationalistic groups and parties, then about the freedom. Viktor Orban is a man who proclaimed that he was a Prime Minister of all Magyars - something akin to Mr. Fox in Mexico claiming the same for Mexicanos - even if living in California or New Mexico. According to media the very same claimed to be for Serbs late Milisevic. Magyars are again not only under their Nyilas Party banner but waving with maps of their pre-Trianon Hungary and proclaiming rather death then abandonment of their Great Hungary. It is pure hatred at the streets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6479</guid>
		<description>Responding to George Roberts, who said, &lt;em&gt;"Jim Bovard’s &lt;strong&gt;fangs&lt;/strong&gt; were showing, again and again when he never mentioned any of these facts in a fairly long and strongly biased, anti Socialist diatribe&lt;/em&gt;."

Fangs? Fangs?

Sounds more like Transylvania than Hungary.

(And will this aside provoke a surge of comments on whether Transylvania should be considered part of Hungary?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to George Roberts, who said, <em>&#8220;Jim Bovard’s <strong>fangs</strong> were showing, again and again when he never mentioned any of these facts in a fairly long and strongly biased, anti Socialist diatribe</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fangs? Fangs?</p>
<p>Sounds more like Transylvania than Hungary.</p>
<p>(And will this aside provoke a surge of comments on whether Transylvania should be considered part of Hungary?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lowe</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6478</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6478</guid>
		<description>Historically, reportage on the ethnic composition of Hungary has been maliciously distorted for so long that no one can believe anything about the people there any more.  What really is a Hungarian?  I know, but do any of you?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically, reportage on the ethnic composition of Hungary has been maliciously distorted for so long that no one can believe anything about the people there any more.  What really is a Hungarian?  I know, but do any of you?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pero Ristow</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Pero Ristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6475</guid>
		<description>What is Laszlo (the PhD) trying to tell us? That Gyurcsany Ferenc mustn't be compared to Bush otherwise he would stop reading the Bovard's Blog? Some menace.
 Actually, I happen to agree with him. Who is Gyurscany after all, with his clumsy lies that didn't kill anybody, to be compared with our greatest, global exterminator of innocent civilian lives, of the twenty first century?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Laszlo (the PhD) trying to tell us? That Gyurcsany Ferenc mustn&#8217;t be compared to Bush otherwise he would stop reading the Bovard&#8217;s Blog? Some menace.<br />
 Actually, I happen to agree with him. Who is Gyurscany after all, with his clumsy lies that didn&#8217;t kill anybody, to be compared with our greatest, global exterminator of innocent civilian lives, of the twenty first century?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chaihorsky</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6464</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chaihorsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6464</guid>
		<description>Poor L. Laszlo, Ph.D.!
Don't worry pal, Dubye is not going to take your ivory tower grants away. No need to soil your pants. Yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor L. Laszlo, Ph.D.!<br />
Don&#8217;t worry pal, Dubye is not going to take your ivory tower grants away. No need to soil your pants. Yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Roberts</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6458</link>
		<dc:creator>George Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6458</guid>
		<description>My response is  primarily to Sebestyen Gorka and to a lesser extent to Jim.
Mr. Gorka:
 I fully anticipated the kind of response you gave  to the issue of the Red &#38; White Striped " Arpad Savos " flag.  Are you seriously suggesting that the use of the flag in the current and a few of the  '56 demonstrations ,  was to recall the glory of the 12th century Royal House of Arpad ??!!! In a pig's eye, Sir  ! It is precisely for the same reason that the Confederate Battle Flag is waved at rallies and demonstrations by the Silent Majority, Christian Right etc. racist provocateurs in America.
So, lets clear this up: If you want to raise the ideas the Arpad Savos  flag they will not be  will not be those of Saint Stephen's but those of Horthy Miklos, The  Vitezi Szek and  Szalasi Ferenc. Have I made myself clear ? Don't try to hide behind obscure history, face the here and now political reality !
You criticise the  bringing up of 20th Century Hungarian history. If what I just told you does not sober you, consider this  quotation : "People who do not know their history are forced to repeat it" George Santayana. 


 I have dissenting comments, from some Hungarian friends and expect many more from others. There is no greater fury of Hell , than when one is  questioning the  virginity and purity of the other's  "Saintly mother"   !! , but whores have occasional children, also. I repeat;  :  If one quacks like a duck.......... It is true , that lying has become synonymous with public speaking,  in most of our countries ;  Hungary, America, even Sweden included ( See recent election scandals in Sweden ! )

What  Jim Bovard never mentioned  ( but La Monde , the British press, even CNN ......DID MENTION IT ! ) is :

1. PM Gyurcsany talked to nearly 1000  party functionaries ( Shades of Khrushchev's " secret " speech ). So it was not exactly an intimate secret inner circle.

2. He said: Enough is enough. You and the previous Socialist PM lied for 4 years and you forced me to lie for 2 years. No more ! I will not lie for you any more. and I wont let you lie either any more .......... So he intended to come clean.

3. The Socialists purged themselves,  by rejecting and forcing to abdicate their own   PM , prior to the elections ! Thereby admitting corruption and incompetence. Still they were elected, as lesser of two Evils and for political  intestinal fortitude. Can you imagine that in today's  USA ? Last time it happened was by Teddy Roosevelt repudiating his own Republicans and declaring the  virtues of Progressivism. Well, the Germans did that....almost, by rejecting Schroeder.

Jim Bovard's fangs were showing, again and again when he never mentioned any of these facts in a fairly long and strongly biased,  anti Socialist diatribe. These facts,   which were  mentioned in straight news stories and editorials by such publications as  Der Spiegel, CNN, Le Monde and the Times of London.
Lastly , isn't it about time that the old lie of equating 21st century Socialists or SocialDemocrats with the Socialist/Communist boogey man of the 1930s, 1950s or even worse ,Stalinist Moscow  Commuism,  ceases to be lied about.  Read Arthur Koestler, read any of the reform Communist dissenters, like Imre Nagy ( before the '56 revoluton he wasdeposed for independent, reformist  ideas ) etc and you wil see that this line is a bold face lie. You can no longer sell that in  any of the Western Democracies. Grow up, Mr. Gorka and others.

Lastly,  for my Hunagarian friends. The memory and writings, lectures of Eva Ancsel speaks to the freedom loving independent soul of those Hungarians who may have been Communists, but of a totally different brand from  Matyas Rakosi and his gangsters. Eva was drummed out of the Communist party and her husband, Gimes ,  tried to file a complaint to the Central Committee against Rakosi for " anti party activities " !!!!  Equating  Ancsel Eva with the likes of the Moscow Communist dictatorship is an odious lie....but it continues, as some of the writings on these pages show.

George Roberts

Figures don't lie ....liars figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response is  primarily to Sebestyen Gorka and to a lesser extent to Jim.<br />
Mr. Gorka:<br />
 I fully anticipated the kind of response you gave  to the issue of the Red &amp; White Striped &#8221; Arpad Savos &#8221; flag.  Are you seriously suggesting that the use of the flag in the current and a few of the  &#8216;56 demonstrations ,  was to recall the glory of the 12th century Royal House of Arpad ??!!! In a pig&#8217;s eye, Sir  ! It is precisely for the same reason that the Confederate Battle Flag is waved at rallies and demonstrations by the Silent Majority, Christian Right etc. racist provocateurs in America.<br />
So, lets clear this up: If you want to raise the ideas the Arpad Savos  flag they will not be  will not be those of Saint Stephen&#8217;s but those of Horthy Miklos, The  Vitezi Szek and  Szalasi Ferenc. Have I made myself clear ? Don&#8217;t try to hide behind obscure history, face the here and now political reality !<br />
You criticise the  bringing up of 20th Century Hungarian history. If what I just told you does not sober you, consider this  quotation : &#8220;People who do not know their history are forced to repeat it&#8221; George Santayana. </p>
<p> I have dissenting comments, from some Hungarian friends and expect many more from others. There is no greater fury of Hell , than when one is  questioning the  virginity and purity of the other&#8217;s  &#8220;Saintly mother&#8221;   !! , but whores have occasional children, also. I repeat;  :  If one quacks like a duck&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. It is true , that lying has become synonymous with public speaking,  in most of our countries ;  Hungary, America, even Sweden included ( See recent election scandals in Sweden ! )</p>
<p>What  Jim Bovard never mentioned  ( but La Monde , the British press, even CNN &#8230;&#8230;DID MENTION IT ! ) is :</p>
<p>1. PM Gyurcsany talked to nearly 1000  party functionaries ( Shades of Khrushchev&#8217;s &#8221; secret &#8221; speech ). So it was not exactly an intimate secret inner circle.</p>
<p>2. He said: Enough is enough. You and the previous Socialist PM lied for 4 years and you forced me to lie for 2 years. No more ! I will not lie for you any more. and I wont let you lie either any more &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. So he intended to come clean.</p>
<p>3. The Socialists purged themselves,  by rejecting and forcing to abdicate their own   PM , prior to the elections ! Thereby admitting corruption and incompetence. Still they were elected, as lesser of two Evils and for political  intestinal fortitude. Can you imagine that in today&#8217;s  USA ? Last time it happened was by Teddy Roosevelt repudiating his own Republicans and declaring the  virtues of Progressivism. Well, the Germans did that&#8230;.almost, by rejecting Schroeder.</p>
<p>Jim Bovard&#8217;s fangs were showing, again and again when he never mentioned any of these facts in a fairly long and strongly biased,  anti Socialist diatribe. These facts,   which were  mentioned in straight news stories and editorials by such publications as  Der Spiegel, CNN, Le Monde and the Times of London.<br />
Lastly , isn&#8217;t it about time that the old lie of equating 21st century Socialists or SocialDemocrats with the Socialist/Communist boogey man of the 1930s, 1950s or even worse ,Stalinist Moscow  Commuism,  ceases to be lied about.  Read Arthur Koestler, read any of the reform Communist dissenters, like Imre Nagy ( before the &#8216;56 revoluton he wasdeposed for independent, reformist  ideas ) etc and you wil see that this line is a bold face lie. You can no longer sell that in  any of the Western Democracies. Grow up, Mr. Gorka and others.</p>
<p>Lastly,  for my Hunagarian friends. The memory and writings, lectures of Eva Ancsel speaks to the freedom loving independent soul of those Hungarians who may have been Communists, but of a totally different brand from  Matyas Rakosi and his gangsters. Eva was drummed out of the Communist party and her husband, Gimes ,  tried to file a complaint to the Central Committee against Rakosi for &#8221; anti party activities &#8221; !!!!  Equating  Ancsel Eva with the likes of the Moscow Communist dictatorship is an odious lie&#8230;.but it continues, as some of the writings on these pages show.</p>
<p>George Roberts</p>
<p>Figures don&#8217;t lie &#8230;.liars figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2006/10/27/every-day-is-1956-the-hungarian-revolution-today/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Eastern European countries in the 1930’s had the unpleasant options of siding with the brown shirted socialists, the red shirted socialists, or siding with ‘the west’ and being invaded and massacred by both sets of socialists.  Probably because the red shirted socialists had already killed millions before the war even began, most of them threw their lot in with the brown side until Stalingrad, when they realized the red shirts offered better prospects for survival.   

The only 2 ethnic groups that didn’t make substantial contributions to the Axis armies were the Poles and Serbs, and neither of them got anything to show for this.  The red shirted socialists kept the third of Poland they grabbed before they had their spat with their brown shirted comrades, and the Serbians, ironically and perversely, became the Hitler du Jour in the 90’s despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of them (and about fifty thousand Yugoslavian Jews) were killed by the Croatian Ustashe during the war.

Watching the nervous indifference of the Americans to their own governments doomed ideological crusade makes me much more tolerant of the behavior of Europeans in the 1930’s.  They simply kept choosing the least painful option available to them at the moment, which obviously precluded critical thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eastern European countries in the 1930’s had the unpleasant options of siding with the brown shirted socialists, the red shirted socialists, or siding with ‘the west’ and being invaded and massacred by both sets of socialists.  Probably because the red shirted socialists had already killed millions before the war even began, most of them threw their lot in with the brown side until Stalingrad, when they realized the red shirts offered better prospects for survival.   </p>
<p>The only 2 ethnic groups that didn’t make substantial contributions to the Axis armies were the Poles and Serbs, and neither of them got anything to show for this.  The red shirted socialists kept the third of Poland they grabbed before they had their spat with their brown shirted comrades, and the Serbians, ironically and perversely, became the Hitler du Jour in the 90’s despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of them (and about fifty thousand Yugoslavian Jews) were killed by the Croatian Ustashe during the war.</p>
<p>Watching the nervous indifference of the Americans to their own governments doomed ideological crusade makes me much more tolerant of the behavior of Europeans in the 1930’s.  They simply kept choosing the least painful option available to them at the moment, which obviously precluded critical thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

