<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Speechwriter View on Freedom, 1999</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/</link>
	<description>Author James Bovard</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bigbenr</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-66687</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbenr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-66687</guid>
		<description>Greetings, my children! You have been called here to recapitulate the principal steps of our new program. As you know, we had hoped to have twenty years between wars to consolidate the great gains which we made from the WW II, but our increasing numbers in certain natal areas ia arousing opposition to us, and we must work with every means at our disposal to precipitate WW III WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. This IS IT..THIS IS IT! 
Of course the good and noble Republicans would never do such a thing, everyone knows that. RIGHT! It has often been said that the first casualty of war is the truth and we know that to be true. We have been down this same road before and seen this same scenario even before George, the puppet, Bush was elected president our government had no excuse for invading a sovereign nation, so we invented one, 9-11 was the answer. The government of Afghanistan nor the government of Iraq had anything to do with 9-11, but were blamed anyway.lurking behind the scene are the NEOCONS pulling the strings to start these wars. The evil bastards, and that is a kind word for what they are, have their eye on, first, the Middle east and eventually the entire worlds oil, and most of the world’s leaders are co-conspirators in their plot. Now they are trying to start a world war between the Muslims and the West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings, my children! You have been called here to recapitulate the principal steps of our new program. As you know, we had hoped to have twenty years between wars to consolidate the great gains which we made from the WW II, but our increasing numbers in certain natal areas ia arousing opposition to us, and we must work with every means at our disposal to precipitate WW III WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. This IS IT..THIS IS IT!<br />
Of course the good and noble Republicans would never do such a thing, everyone knows that. RIGHT! It has often been said that the first casualty of war is the truth and we know that to be true. We have been down this same road before and seen this same scenario even before George, the puppet, Bush was elected president our government had no excuse for invading a sovereign nation, so we invented one, 9-11 was the answer. The government of Afghanistan nor the government of Iraq had anything to do with 9-11, but were blamed anyway.lurking behind the scene are the NEOCONS pulling the strings to start these wars. The evil bastards, and that is a kind word for what they are, have their eye on, first, the Middle east and eventually the entire worlds oil, and most of the world’s leaders are co-conspirators in their plot. Now they are trying to start a world war between the Muslims and the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbenr</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-66685</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbenr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-66685</guid>
		<description>You republican gun nuts are really easily brainwashed, and the sad part about it is that your own party is brainwashing its own constituents. 

Go ahead. make a comment about how I "worship Micheal Moore" and how "evil liberals are ruining this country." hehe

And please also disregard the fact that the President got us into another Vietnam, and the fact that there is A FULL SCALE CIVIL WAR GOING ON NOW. CHILDREN SHOT IN OUR STREETS!!!

Whatever the NRA tells you, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You republican gun nuts are really easily brainwashed, and the sad part about it is that your own party is brainwashing its own constituents. </p>
<p>Go ahead. make a comment about how I &#8220;worship Micheal Moore&#8221; and how &#8220;evil liberals are ruining this country.&#8221; hehe</p>
<p>And please also disregard the fact that the President got us into another Vietnam, and the fact that there is A FULL SCALE CIVIL WAR GOING ON NOW. CHILDREN SHOT IN OUR STREETS!!!</p>
<p>Whatever the NRA tells you, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27553</guid>
		<description>Ya, I have difficulty understanding the complacency that so many conservatives have with boundless power. They seem to think that "their team" will control the gates...

Great quote regarding Hitler coming to power.  Do you recall who said that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, I have difficulty understanding the complacency that so many conservatives have with boundless power. They seem to think that &#8220;their team&#8221; will control the gates&#8230;</p>
<p>Great quote regarding Hitler coming to power.  Do you recall who said that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam S.</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27529</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27529</guid>
		<description>I am always amazed at so-called conservatives. They want government out of the way, until it comes near them. Every time that government shrinks into unobtrusiveness, "conservatives" come out with cries of "the excesses of democracy" or "the failure of the marketplace" We must always take the word of fairweather conservatives with a grain of salt. It was a conservative in Nazi Germany who said when Hitler came to power," O thank God! We're free of our freedom"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always amazed at so-called conservatives. They want government out of the way, until it comes near them. Every time that government shrinks into unobtrusiveness, &#8220;conservatives&#8221; come out with cries of &#8220;the excesses of democracy&#8221; or &#8220;the failure of the marketplace&#8221; We must always take the word of fairweather conservatives with a grain of salt. It was a conservative in Nazi Germany who said when Hitler came to power,&#8221; O thank God! We&#8217;re free of our freedom&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam S.</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27528</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27528</guid>
		<description>I believe that Mr. Scully's article is the most preposterous thing I have read in quite some time. The response from the majority of conservatism has never been anything even approaching contrarian. It is always like Big Daddy, sitting in a rocking chair in the shade, drinking a mint julep, saying "Yep, it's good to own land" One person noting the lack of cogency in conservative responses, declared that they will only worry about State Socialism when we establish a Communist dictatorship here, too late for that.
    Mr. Scully also typifies the lingering staleness, the everlasting halitosis that is the National Review. From the beginning that magazine has never been really conservative, and has only featured marginal "Libertarian Window-Dressing" (e.g. Rothbard and Chodorov)in its pages as a sop to distract us from its perpetual march to the center left.  One can listen to any mainstream conservative broadcast and observe a movement that has reached near parody performance. Like Kafka's officer, Scully is willing to let himself be chopped to bits by the political machinery to prove that the State protects his freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Mr. Scully&#8217;s article is the most preposterous thing I have read in quite some time. The response from the majority of conservatism has never been anything even approaching contrarian. It is always like Big Daddy, sitting in a rocking chair in the shade, drinking a mint julep, saying &#8220;Yep, it&#8217;s good to own land&#8221; One person noting the lack of cogency in conservative responses, declared that they will only worry about State Socialism when we establish a Communist dictatorship here, too late for that.<br />
    Mr. Scully also typifies the lingering staleness, the everlasting halitosis that is the National Review. From the beginning that magazine has never been really conservative, and has only featured marginal &#8220;Libertarian Window-Dressing&#8221; (e.g. Rothbard and Chodorov)in its pages as a sop to distract us from its perpetual march to the center left.  One can listen to any mainstream conservative broadcast and observe a movement that has reached near parody performance. Like Kafka&#8217;s officer, Scully is willing to let himself be chopped to bits by the political machinery to prove that the State protects his freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orville H. Larson</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27441</link>
		<dc:creator>Orville H. Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27441</guid>
		<description>Do you remember the TV show "The FBI" (ABC, 1965-74)? It starred Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. as the brisk, efficient Inspector Lewis Erskine. The FBI worked in close cooperation with the show, and thus exerted a tacit influence over it.

"The FBI", of course, portrayed the Bureau in keeping with Hoover's propaganda. Today, we know the FBI isn't a superhuman law enforcement agency but an ordinary, flawed outfit that lived off its myth for too long.

As John Kennedy once said, "The three most overrated things in the world are the state of Texas, hunting trophies, and the FBI."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you remember the TV show &#8220;The FBI&#8221; (ABC, 1965-74)? It starred Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. as the brisk, efficient Inspector Lewis Erskine. The FBI worked in close cooperation with the show, and thus exerted a tacit influence over it.</p>
<p>&#8220;The FBI&#8221;, of course, portrayed the Bureau in keeping with Hoover&#8217;s propaganda. Today, we know the FBI isn&#8217;t a superhuman law enforcement agency but an ordinary, flawed outfit that lived off its myth for too long.</p>
<p>As John Kennedy once said, &#8220;The three most overrated things in the world are the state of Texas, hunting trophies, and the FBI.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27424</guid>
		<description>Tom - great quip on National Review, the smart cult.

At least none of their cruise ship tours have sunk so far, least that I know of. 

Scully's review captures fashionable conservative thinking on freedom before GWB.  With friends like these, gun owners, dissidents, and Deadheads don't need any enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom - great quip on National Review, the smart cult.</p>
<p>At least none of their cruise ship tours have sunk so far, least that I know of. </p>
<p>Scully&#8217;s review captures fashionable conservative thinking on freedom before GWB.  With friends like these, gun owners, dissidents, and Deadheads don&#8217;t need any enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blanton</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27417</guid>
		<description>Scully's advice to steer clear of "stupid cults" has me wondering if the National Review is a smart cult.

Would Scully argue that Mayfield shoudn't have joined that stupid Muslim cult? 

But, who can argue with "the slaves still have it mighty good here"?

Scully reveals what modern conservatism has adopted as a philosophy:

Merely obey the dictates of the paternalistic state and your slavery will be quite enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scully&#8217;s advice to steer clear of &#8220;stupid cults&#8221; has me wondering if the National Review is a smart cult.</p>
<p>Would Scully argue that Mayfield shoudn&#8217;t have joined that stupid Muslim cult? </p>
<p>But, who can argue with &#8220;the slaves still have it mighty good here&#8221;?</p>
<p>Scully reveals what modern conservatism has adopted as a philosophy:</p>
<p>Merely obey the dictates of the paternalistic state and your slavery will be quite enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27397</guid>
		<description>That's hilarious!

This refers to the Brandon Mayfield case.  Here's my take on it from the October 11, 2004 issue of American Conservative ( http://www.amconmag.com/2004_10_11/article.html

Undue Process


Innocents have been entangled in the Justice Department's anti-terror dragnet.
By James Bovard

The train wrecks of the Justice Department’s domestic War on Terror continue to pile up. Despite the perennial victory claims by Attorney General John Ashcroft and other high officials, three recent cases vivify how federal prosecutors and FBI agents continue tripping over the evidence—or worse.

On May 7, the FBI arrested Brandon Mayfield, an Oregon lawyer, for his alleged involvement in the Madrid train bombings of March 11 that killed 191 and left 2,000 wounded. A U.S. counterterrorism official (almost certainly an FBI or Justice Department official) told Newsweek that Mayfield’s fingerprint was an “absolutely incontrovertible match” to a copy of the fingerprint found on a bag of bomb detonators near the scene of the Madrid attack. News of Mayfield’s arrest provided alarming evidence that Americans were involved in international conspiracies to slaughter civilians around the globe, and he was informed that he could face the death penalty for his crimes. 

Employing Patriot Act powers, the feds, prior to the arrest, conducted secret searches of Mayfield’s home and tapped his phone and e-mail. After the arrest, they froze his bank accounts. The FBI’s arrest affidavit revealed that its agents had “observed Mayfield drive to the Bilal Mosque located at 415 160th Ave., Beaverton, Oregon, on several different occasions.” Another incriminating detail in the arrest warrant: Mayfield advertised his legal service in the Muslim Yellow Pages. (Mayfield, a former Army lieutenant, converted to Islam and has an Egyptian wife.) In early April, the Spanish police described Mayfield “as a U.S. military veteran who was already under investigation by U.S. authorities for alleged ties to Islamic terrorism,” according to the Los Angeles Times. 

Yet the key to the case—the fingerprint—was shakier than a George W. Bush press conference. The FBI quickly claimed to have achieved a match on the partial print, but, on April 13, Spanish government officials warned the FBI that their experts were “conclusively negative” that Mayfield’s print matched the print on the bomb detonator bag. The FBI responded by flying one of its fingerprint analysts to Madrid to explain to the Spaniards why they were wrong. But during the Madrid visit, the FBI expert never requested to see the bag or to get a better copy of the print. The arrest warrant in early May wrongly informed a federal judge that the Spaniards were “satisfied” with the FBI’s match. 

Mayfield was arrested as a “material witness,” thereby permitting the feds to hold him as long as they pleased without charging him with a specific crime. The Justice Department refuses to disclose how many people have been or are being held as “material witnesses” in prisons around the country. 

After Mayfield was arrested, FBI agents raided his home and office and carted off boxes of his papers and his family’s belongings. Among the items seized were “miscellaneous Spanish documents,” according to an FBI statement to the federal court. These supposedly incriminating papers turned out to be the Spanish homework of Mayfield’s son. Perhaps elite FBI investigators suspected that “Hola, Paco. Como Estas?” was a secret code.

Though the FBI never possessed anything on Mayfield aside from a misidentified fingerprint, it did not hesitate to cast him in sinister colors. The FBI informed a federal judge: “It is believed that Mayfield may have traveled under a false or fictitious name.” But Mayfield, whose passport expired the previous year, insisted he had not left the country. The FBI apparently never bothered to check whether Mayfield had been absent from the U.S. before making one of the most high-profile terrorism arrests of the year. 

On May 20, after Spanish authorities announced that they had found a clean match with the fingerprint, the Justice Department acquiesced to Mayfield’s release. A few weeks later, Attorney General Ashcroft informed the Senate Judiciary Committee that his case vindicated the American system of justice: “As a matter of fact, the pride of our system is that people are found innocent because we adjudicate these things.” But there was effectively no adjudication in this case because Mayfield was classified as a “material witness”— which meant that the feds could hold him as long as they chose, or at least until his detention became too embarrassing. Ashcroft also testified, “When we learned that the reservations of the Spanish were so substantial, we went to the court, asked for the release of Mr. Mayfield.” In reality, the Justice Department did not acquiesce until the Spanish government announced that they had arrested the Algerian whose fingerprint matched that on the bag. 

FBI director Robert Mueller visited Portland a month after Mayfield’s release and announced that FBI agents had acted appropriately. Yet, as a Portland Oregonian editorial noted, “If not for the Spanish authorities doing their own investigation, Mayfield likely would still be in jail today.” And sadly, the unfortunate Mr. Mayfield is not an isolated case.... [other cases discussed  in the article..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hilarious!</p>
<p>This refers to the Brandon Mayfield case.  Here&#8217;s my take on it from the October 11, 2004 issue of American Conservative ( <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/2004_10_11/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.amconmag.com/2004_10_11/article.html</a></p>
<p>Undue Process</p>
<p>Innocents have been entangled in the Justice Department&#8217;s anti-terror dragnet.<br />
By James Bovard</p>
<p>The train wrecks of the Justice Department’s domestic War on Terror continue to pile up. Despite the perennial victory claims by Attorney General John Ashcroft and other high officials, three recent cases vivify how federal prosecutors and FBI agents continue tripping over the evidence—or worse.</p>
<p>On May 7, the FBI arrested Brandon Mayfield, an Oregon lawyer, for his alleged involvement in the Madrid train bombings of March 11 that killed 191 and left 2,000 wounded. A U.S. counterterrorism official (almost certainly an FBI or Justice Department official) told Newsweek that Mayfield’s fingerprint was an “absolutely incontrovertible match” to a copy of the fingerprint found on a bag of bomb detonators near the scene of the Madrid attack. News of Mayfield’s arrest provided alarming evidence that Americans were involved in international conspiracies to slaughter civilians around the globe, and he was informed that he could face the death penalty for his crimes. </p>
<p>Employing Patriot Act powers, the feds, prior to the arrest, conducted secret searches of Mayfield’s home and tapped his phone and e-mail. After the arrest, they froze his bank accounts. The FBI’s arrest affidavit revealed that its agents had “observed Mayfield drive to the Bilal Mosque located at 415 160th Ave., Beaverton, Oregon, on several different occasions.” Another incriminating detail in the arrest warrant: Mayfield advertised his legal service in the Muslim Yellow Pages. (Mayfield, a former Army lieutenant, converted to Islam and has an Egyptian wife.) In early April, the Spanish police described Mayfield “as a U.S. military veteran who was already under investigation by U.S. authorities for alleged ties to Islamic terrorism,” according to the Los Angeles Times. </p>
<p>Yet the key to the case—the fingerprint—was shakier than a George W. Bush press conference. The FBI quickly claimed to have achieved a match on the partial print, but, on April 13, Spanish government officials warned the FBI that their experts were “conclusively negative” that Mayfield’s print matched the print on the bomb detonator bag. The FBI responded by flying one of its fingerprint analysts to Madrid to explain to the Spaniards why they were wrong. But during the Madrid visit, the FBI expert never requested to see the bag or to get a better copy of the print. The arrest warrant in early May wrongly informed a federal judge that the Spaniards were “satisfied” with the FBI’s match. </p>
<p>Mayfield was arrested as a “material witness,” thereby permitting the feds to hold him as long as they pleased without charging him with a specific crime. The Justice Department refuses to disclose how many people have been or are being held as “material witnesses” in prisons around the country. </p>
<p>After Mayfield was arrested, FBI agents raided his home and office and carted off boxes of his papers and his family’s belongings. Among the items seized were “miscellaneous Spanish documents,” according to an FBI statement to the federal court. These supposedly incriminating papers turned out to be the Spanish homework of Mayfield’s son. Perhaps elite FBI investigators suspected that “Hola, Paco. Como Estas?” was a secret code.</p>
<p>Though the FBI never possessed anything on Mayfield aside from a misidentified fingerprint, it did not hesitate to cast him in sinister colors. The FBI informed a federal judge: “It is believed that Mayfield may have traveled under a false or fictitious name.” But Mayfield, whose passport expired the previous year, insisted he had not left the country. The FBI apparently never bothered to check whether Mayfield had been absent from the U.S. before making one of the most high-profile terrorism arrests of the year. </p>
<p>On May 20, after Spanish authorities announced that they had found a clean match with the fingerprint, the Justice Department acquiesced to Mayfield’s release. A few weeks later, Attorney General Ashcroft informed the Senate Judiciary Committee that his case vindicated the American system of justice: “As a matter of fact, the pride of our system is that people are found innocent because we adjudicate these things.” But there was effectively no adjudication in this case because Mayfield was classified as a “material witness”— which meant that the feds could hold him as long as they chose, or at least until his detention became too embarrassing. Ashcroft also testified, “When we learned that the reservations of the Spanish were so substantial, we went to the court, asked for the release of Mr. Mayfield.” In reality, the Justice Department did not acquiesce until the Spanish government announced that they had arrested the Algerian whose fingerprint matched that on the bag. </p>
<p>FBI director Robert Mueller visited Portland a month after Mayfield’s release and announced that FBI agents had acted appropriately. Yet, as a Portland Oregonian editorial noted, “If not for the Spanish authorities doing their own investigation, Mayfield likely would still be in jail today.” And sadly, the unfortunate Mr. Mayfield is not an isolated case&#8230;. [other cases discussed  in the article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawhobbit</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27395</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawhobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27395</guid>
		<description>Only if they can find a partial fingerprint on the mud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if they can find a partial fingerprint on the mud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27394</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Hobbit - freedom mud hasn't been legal there in Oregon since 1986.

I hear that if you're even suspected of possessing it, the U.S. attorney in Portland might grab you and hold you incommunicado for weeks as a material witness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Hobbit - freedom mud hasn&#8217;t been legal there in Oregon since 1986.</p>
<p>I hear that if you&#8217;re even suspected of possessing it, the U.S. attorney in Portland might grab you and hold you incommunicado for weeks as a material witness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawhobbit</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27393</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawhobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27393</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....now when I read Jim's blog I'm going to feel like I'm wallowing in moral squalor which has a tyranny all its own.  Oh well, you do what you have to - hey Jim, could you pass some more of that freedom mud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.now when I read Jim&#8217;s blog I&#8217;m going to feel like I&#8217;m wallowing in moral squalor which has a tyranny all its own.  Oh well, you do what you have to - hey Jim, could you pass some more of that freedom mud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/02/25/bush-speechwriter-view-on-freedom-1999/#comment-27391</guid>
		<description>Well that guy has enlightened me. If we all just avoid illegal drugs we won't get in to trouble. I'm sure people like Lonnie Lundy would be willing to debate that assertion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that guy has enlightened me. If we all just avoid illegal drugs we won&#8217;t get in to trouble. I&#8217;m sure people like Lonnie Lundy would be willing to debate that assertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

