<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Rampage Update &#038; Contact Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/</link>
	<description>Author James Bovard</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Neil</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-85014</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O'Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-85014</guid>
		<description>Mace, you're right -- but Alley Oop was a good bit more thoughtful and clever than Mr Glock-head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mace, you&#8217;re right &#8212; but Alley Oop was a good bit more thoughtful and clever than Mr Glock-head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84783</guid>
		<description>Mace - a good cigar and a fine pair sounds like a great start - but why ruin it by wearing formalwear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mace - a good cigar and a fine pair sounds like a great start - but why ruin it by wearing formalwear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 05:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84491</guid>
		<description>..I should have a Cuban cigar, a Voluptuous young blonde on each arm of an expensive dinner jacket too...But I don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..I should have a Cuban cigar, a Voluptuous young blonde on each arm of an expensive dinner jacket too&#8230;But I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84237</link>
		<dc:creator>Windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-84237</guid>
		<description>It is my not so humble opinion that because we place law enforcement officers in a position of authority over the rest of us, that they should be held to a much higher standard of behavior.  No cop should be allowed to commit what would be a "criminal" act if committed by an ordinary citizen, no matter the reason (including "sting" operations).  Further, all cops should be required to treat every citizen, even one they are arresting, with courtesy (unless that person is actively attacking them).  No knock raids should be outlawed, then no innocent person would have a legitimate reason to shoot at them.  They should also not be allowed to shoot family pets under any circumstances, one of those pole/loop jobbies that animal control uses would suffice to prevent a family pet from attacking police in defense of its family; killing the animal is not necessary, and is downright cruel whether the arrestee is innocent or guilty, especially if children are present.  I have no problem with police tracking dogs, I do however have a problem with police attack dogs, if anything in this world should be banned, police attack dogs are one.  I would much prefer it if the police would stick to enforcing the laws against doing physical harm to another or another's property and leave the vices (drugs, prostitution, gambling, smoking, drinking in public, etc.) out of the picture.  Making criminals out of (formerly law abiding) people who have a vice that has fallen out of favor with politicians is just plain wrong and the police should not stoop to enforcing those ridiculous "moral" laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my not so humble opinion that because we place law enforcement officers in a position of authority over the rest of us, that they should be held to a much higher standard of behavior.  No cop should be allowed to commit what would be a &#8220;criminal&#8221; act if committed by an ordinary citizen, no matter the reason (including &#8220;sting&#8221; operations).  Further, all cops should be required to treat every citizen, even one they are arresting, with courtesy (unless that person is actively attacking them).  No knock raids should be outlawed, then no innocent person would have a legitimate reason to shoot at them.  They should also not be allowed to shoot family pets under any circumstances, one of those pole/loop jobbies that animal control uses would suffice to prevent a family pet from attacking police in defense of its family; killing the animal is not necessary, and is downright cruel whether the arrestee is innocent or guilty, especially if children are present.  I have no problem with police tracking dogs, I do however have a problem with police attack dogs, if anything in this world should be banned, police attack dogs are one.  I would much prefer it if the police would stick to enforcing the laws against doing physical harm to another or another&#8217;s property and leave the vices (drugs, prostitution, gambling, smoking, drinking in public, etc.) out of the picture.  Making criminals out of (formerly law abiding) people who have a vice that has fallen out of favor with politicians is just plain wrong and the police should not stoop to enforcing those ridiculous &#8220;moral&#8221; laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83993</guid>
		<description>...By Neanderthal he means a Caveman with a club. Like Alley-Oop in the old funny papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;By Neanderthal he means a Caveman with a club. Like Alley-Oop in the old funny papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Neil</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83974</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O'Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 22:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83974</guid>
		<description>Dave Sgt Glock -

If you are not a parody/satire, then I think you are a pathetic piece of coprolitic detritus.  Your attitudes presented in your various posts are condescending, and reek of a sense of superiority that extends to a right to extinguish another's life.  You are no libertarian, sir.  You wrap your bloodlust in a flag, and in a pledge to liberty, but you really seek to control others and injure or kill those with whom you do not safely agree.  Your supposed respect for the right to disagree is narrow, you charlatan.  You have repeatedly made statements cheering on the injury and murder of other humans.

You are, in a word, pathetically neandertal.

And if you are a parody/satire, you're an unfortunately unfunny one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Sgt Glock -</p>
<p>If you are not a parody/satire, then I think you are a pathetic piece of coprolitic detritus.  Your attitudes presented in your various posts are condescending, and reek of a sense of superiority that extends to a right to extinguish another&#8217;s life.  You are no libertarian, sir.  You wrap your bloodlust in a flag, and in a pledge to liberty, but you really seek to control others and injure or kill those with whom you do not safely agree.  Your supposed respect for the right to disagree is narrow, you charlatan.  You have repeatedly made statements cheering on the injury and murder of other humans.</p>
<p>You are, in a word, pathetically neandertal.</p>
<p>And if you are a parody/satire, you&#8217;re an unfortunately unfunny one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 14:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83757</guid>
		<description>...Given the viciousness of the element they deal with on a daily basis, it's one thing for Police Officers to enjoy the exercise of authority as well as its occasional qualified abuse. But quite another to give it a cynical free reign. After 12 years of swimming in these same polluted waters [Security Guard] I came away with an enormous sense of ambivalence regarding the Cops...In the end I can take 'em, or leave 'em. And I'm certain most would feel the same about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Given the viciousness of the element they deal with on a daily basis, it&#8217;s one thing for Police Officers to enjoy the exercise of authority as well as its occasional qualified abuse. But quite another to give it a cynical free reign. After 12 years of swimming in these same polluted waters [Security Guard] I came away with an enormous sense of ambivalence regarding the Cops&#8230;In the end I can take &#8216;em, or leave &#8216;em. And I&#8217;m certain most would feel the same about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Why would a trained police officer execute a dog which group of children witnessed and were playing with dog?</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83734</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Why would a trained police officer execute a dog which group of children witnessed and were playing with dog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83734</guid>
		<description>[...] http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/pol&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/pol&#8230" rel="nofollow">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/pol&#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturdaynightspecial</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83630</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturdaynightspecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 10:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83630</guid>
		<description>quote:
"...Saturdaynight-you really need some F’ing professional help. I am not even going to lower myself by responding to your BS."

Glock: you're about as low as anyone can get. Just another punk wanna be. You came here to smell the crotch of libertarians. Quit law enforcement and take up waitressing - you'll be safer then. I can easily shove that cigar down your throat - pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;Saturdaynight-you really need some F’ing professional help. I am not even going to lower myself by responding to your BS.&#8221;</p>
<p>Glock: you&#8217;re about as low as anyone can get. Just another punk wanna be. You came here to smell the crotch of libertarians. Quit law enforcement and take up waitressing - you&#8217;ll be safer then. I can easily shove that cigar down your throat - pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fleury</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83557</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fleury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 08:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/23/police-rampage-update-contact-info/#comment-83557</guid>
		<description>Jim:

Good for you for cutting Dave Sgt. Glock some slack concerning his eventual answer to your question.

However, I did notice he said, "I did not take notice of anyone breaking any laws".

Now I don't know about you, but I see the phrase "did not take notice" as a code word for "ignored".  It expresses, IMHO, a willingness to not see.

Maybe I'm being too strict and I hope Dave will clarify.  If I am wrong, I gladly apologize to Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim:</p>
<p>Good for you for cutting Dave Sgt. Glock some slack concerning his eventual answer to your question.</p>
<p>However, I did notice he said, &#8220;I did not take notice of anyone breaking any laws&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t know about you, but I see the phrase &#8220;did not take notice&#8221; as a code word for &#8220;ignored&#8221;.  It expresses, IMHO, a willingness to not see.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m being too strict and I hope Dave will clarify.  If I am wrong, I gladly apologize to Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
