http://www.gopcatholics.blogspot.com

Maybe that’s one of those trick questions that only a Wiz kid who scored almost perfectly on their SAT - like Eliot Spitzer - can answer.

…but I earned my D’s in high school Spanish fair and square, so any Spanish label is verboten.

As we are unabashedly crazy, might I suggest “El Barbudo Loco” ? It would seem to play better than El Barbudo Barracho

Enjoyed it. The comment about Clinton and chastity was spot on and describes the fools who thought McCain was an antiwar candidate. It is appropriate for them to board the Straight Jacket Express. It is good to see that you and Brian are familiar with the late Dr. Francis’ writings. For the benefit of the others who may not be familiar with the term “anarcho-tyranny” here’s the definition written by Sam Francis on 24/11/03 in one of his columns:

“Mr. [Bob] Barr’s words are almost a definition of the system of government I have called “anarcho-tyranny”: a combination of anarchy (in which legitimate government functions—like spying on the bad guys or punishing real criminals—are not performed) and tyranny (in which government performs illegitimate functions—like spying on the good guys or criminalizing innocent conduct like gun ownership and political dissent).”

http://www.vdare.com/francis/patriot_act.htm

Brian, you have a fine show and a fine wit. You and Charles Goyette are the exception to my belief that most talk radio is neocon idiotcy, just 95% of it.

If one runs on a platform of Small Government, non-intervention, protection of civil liberties and anti-FED during a period when:
1. The Government is stuck in Fat Camp
2.Interventionism has produced strategic disaster
3.The President , without a hint of irony or embarrassment demands that Congress grant immunity to Telelcom Companies for spying on the citizen
4. The FED pretty well looks to have given us a lesson on why it’s dangerous

and yet still his campaign can’t get out of the minus 10% territory……well, one wonders when he could ever get elected and if elected, what good might it do?

No, the lapsed Republic will now stage an elaborate Mexican Wrestling Match to the bitter end.

Mr. Paul is a great guy, a stalwart champion of what we need now but the lapsed-Republic is addicted to pain killers and aint going to wise up til it has to go cold turkey which, come to find out, these reckless ijits are sure to get us there soon enough.

But I mean this in only the nicest way.

Paul didn’t drop out; he “wound down” his campaign. What does that mean? First, that he’s almost out of money; he had only $6 million on hand Jan. 1, but spent all that through Super Tuesday. All he has is what’s left of the $6 million he’s raised this year. There won’t be much more; his donor base hasn’t dried up so much as fractured. For sure there won’t be any more big money bombs. Second, McCain may be out of money; he may be subject to FEC guidelines, and may have exceeded them - it’s moot, as the FEC has too many vacancies for a definitive ruling.
So, no money, no campaign. But Paul is still on the ballot; and I expect his totals to start going up. (I can’t see McCain getting 95% votes, can you?). It’ll just be campaigning under other guises; the first one, I’m expecting, will be a book tour when “The Revolution” comes out.

Has the Department of Homeland Security heard about your pursuit of this panacea?

Paul is not finished yet on the political scene. He can still have a positive impact as a congressman.