I’m not convinced that Forrests reputation for rebel ebonics is fully accurate, I’ve read a few of his prepared remarks nd they are quite literate. Regardless of that, what we need is men literate in insurgent campaigns if we continue to think we are required to be BIG DADDY to the world while tanking ourselves internally.

I have read a couple recent Forrest biographies and they concluded that he got a bum rap on Fort Pillow.

As far as having a Forrest in Iraq - I can’t imagine the NeoCons in the Pentagon would have ever permitted the appointment of a commander who would have scored as Forrest likely would have done on the Verbal SATs. (But he whipped wagonloads of smart-ass Yankee officers just the same)

If the wizards in Richmond had had the courage to give him command, Sherman’s march might have turned into a rout back across the Ohio River.

Too bad that most of the people who are supposed to be professional don’t seem to have the Bedford Forrest gumption for a fight.

The liesuretariet insists on maintaining some kind counterfeit moral compass while reading back issues of Screw Magazine sandwiched in a cover from a 1959 Ladies Home Journal. We could call it dishonesty if it were not for the minor complication of dishonesty being the new honest.

We send virginal reformers and populists into that new tenth ring of purgatory called the Washington Beltway only to find them, a few sessions of Congress later …hunkered down in a murky bar between a greased lobbyist on one side and a swarthy arms merchant on the other whilst engaged in a moon-eyed discussion concerning mineral rights with an Asian Steppe Dictator. Gosh but embezzlement, lying, torture, bribery, bunko, armed intervention and check-kiting is somebody else’s problem. We’ve got smaller fish to fry like say a Coffee-tasting junket to Colombia or a Museum of Cannibalism in Elko.

What this anti-war campaign needs is a cross between Nathan Bedford Forrest, Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, the old Mort Sahl, Attila the Hun and John Brown if John Brown had a sense of humor instead of a sense of Christian Mayhem. “Hillary tough on Obama”….hheeeeehaww. If somebody simply spoke truth to these Power Smack-heads, a large contingent of the public, in all likelihood
would get behind them. Then again, with this sensation-addicted bunch, it all might just be pissing into the Typhoon because with Hillary telling the public she’d turn Tehran into Carthage on a sacharine morning show, it would appear that the viewing audience has been willingly shanghaied on the Death Train, singing melancholy songs of woe.

The Brothers of the Book done let the barrel fire get a tad too hot and it’s melting the siding on the doublewide and we still like to think we’re the Beav.
And they insist Pagans are primitive.

Ron Paul is likely too well along toward retirement for this heavy lifting but the least he could do is locate a Dirty Harry someplace and turn him loose.

Advertisements against these filthy war profiteers cheapens the issue, puts it on a par with choosing Snapple or Tang.

What we need are some professionals.

Love,
Jenny Lind

check out Ron Paul Forums