<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Democrats Better on Surveillance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/</link>
	<description>Author James Bovard</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirk W. Sabin</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk W. Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119571</guid>
		<description>"Libertymaven"...Of course you are right but one cannot match the great fun of a Republican Party pursuing Clinton over an intern and him lying about it leading to an impeachment while the Democrats take everything "off the table" despite the major illegalities of the Bush Administration.

Jean, 
Unfortunately, we have to live the life these cranks have created for us and so....humor becomes vital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Libertymaven&#8221;&#8230;Of course you are right but one cannot match the great fun of a Republican Party pursuing Clinton over an intern and him lying about it leading to an impeachment while the Democrats take everything &#8220;off the table&#8221; despite the major illegalities of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>Jean,<br />
Unfortunately, we have to live the life these cranks have created for us and so&#8230;.humor becomes vital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Infamous Oregon Lawhobbit</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119566</link>
		<dc:creator>The Infamous Oregon Lawhobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119566</guid>
		<description>No, they're not.  Next question?  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they&#8217;re not.  Next question?  <img src='http://jimbovard.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119562</guid>
		<description>Dirk, can you pass a few bottles of that single malt scotch, so I can do my best Ekabob Crane routine, so I can ride next to the Unicorn Steed named "Change".  
Or better yet, have Paul Revere or Israel Bissell ride next to him.  How can anyone take these people seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk, can you pass a few bottles of that single malt scotch, so I can do my best Ekabob Crane routine, so I can ride next to the Unicorn Steed named &#8220;Change&#8221;.<br />
Or better yet, have Paul Revere or Israel Bissell ride next to him.  How can anyone take these people seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Howard</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119554</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119554</guid>
		<description>Mr Bovard, 
am currently doing a senior history extension project on the Clinton years, as a respected historian, I would appreciate any personal views and/or other historians on the matter. 
thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Bovard,<br />
am currently doing a senior history extension project on the Clinton years, as a respected historian, I would appreciate any personal views and/or other historians on the matter.<br />
thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119531</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119531</guid>
		<description>This is a great reminder to those of us who value our 4th Amendment rights.  Bush was terrible for us but the Democrats have historically been just awful too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great reminder to those of us who value our 4th Amendment rights.  Bush was terrible for us but the Democrats have historically been just awful too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libertymaven</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119527</link>
		<dc:creator>libertymaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119527</guid>
		<description>Dirk said:
"... he was just a tad curtailed by the dingbats who thought a besmirched dress was a good enough reason to pursue an impeachment."


They pursued impeachment because he LIED UNDER OATH. You cannot get impeached for "besmirching" a dress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk said:<br />
&#8220;&#8230; he was just a tad curtailed by the dingbats who thought a besmirched dress was a good enough reason to pursue an impeachment.&#8221;</p>
<p>They pursued impeachment because he LIED UNDER OATH. You cannot get impeached for &#8220;besmirching&#8221; a dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk W. Sabin</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk W. Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119524</guid>
		<description>The idea that this newly ascendent Democrat Party will be any better at controlling government excess than the disgraced ciphers who have ruined the Republican party is a real thigh slapper. Bubba was a precursor to the current crop of Sunbeams for the Unitary Executive, he was just a tad curtailed by the dingbats who thought a besmirched dress was a good enough reason to pursue an impeachment. 

These Democrats and their new Hero riding his Unicorn Steed named "Change" into Town will simply tell everyone they will impose their will with cheerful sentiment instead of dark secrecy. We'll get a bevy of Cheerleaders and a marching band to accompany that new Homeland Security Active Duty Combat Brigade at Fort Stewart. We'll have pep rallys and all will agree that an over-reaching government of Inflation-Deflation Huffers is better because it's Democrat, and therefor populist.  

It is a tragedy that we cannot have the currency backed by boneheads because then we'd be swimming in riches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that this newly ascendent Democrat Party will be any better at controlling government excess than the disgraced ciphers who have ruined the Republican party is a real thigh slapper. Bubba was a precursor to the current crop of Sunbeams for the Unitary Executive, he was just a tad curtailed by the dingbats who thought a besmirched dress was a good enough reason to pursue an impeachment. </p>
<p>These Democrats and their new Hero riding his Unicorn Steed named &#8220;Change&#8221; into Town will simply tell everyone they will impose their will with cheerful sentiment instead of dark secrecy. We&#8217;ll get a bevy of Cheerleaders and a marching band to accompany that new Homeland Security Active Duty Combat Brigade at Fort Stewart. We&#8217;ll have pep rallys and all will agree that an over-reaching government of Inflation-Deflation Huffers is better because it&#8217;s Democrat, and therefor populist.  </p>
<p>It is a tragedy that we cannot have the currency backed by boneheads because then we&#8217;d be swimming in riches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Very Free</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2008/12/12/are-democrats-better-on-surveillance/#comment-119515</link>
		<dc:creator>Very Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=633#comment-119515</guid>
		<description>Dems are WORSE on snooping laws, since they're in bed with the Fraternal Order of Police. They cuddle after coital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems are WORSE on snooping laws, since they&#8217;re in bed with the Fraternal Order of Police. They cuddle after coital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
