<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LISTEN LIVE - on the Brian Wilson Show Today (4/23)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/</link>
	<description>Author James Bovard</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wilson</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/#comment-120602</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=849#comment-120602</guid>
		<description>Only NPR can claim the joy of "uninterrupted" programming. As the Host, nothing is more inconvieent and frustrating than having to stop a yap fest with Jim Bovard for the WSJ Report or any other "words from our sponsors". But such is the reality of Capitalism and commercial broadcasting.
As Program Director,it goes w/o saying WSPD has to provide various programming elements to serve the audience during those vaccuous times Jim or Walter Williams or Tom DiLorenzo or similar guests aren't'on with me. The audience is in dire need of the intel these guests provide -- but commerical radio is a tough "classroom". One almost has to trick the audience into learning the truth.
While I am not an aplologist for the WSJ,I can tell you that the Front page and the Editorial page have little in common beyond who signs their paycheck. Stephen Moore,in charge of the fiscal oversight of the WSJ Editorial Dept and writer for their "Political Diary", has been a personal friend since his days at Cato. Any common ground shared by the WSJ and the WSJ Editorial pages is purely coincidental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only NPR can claim the joy of &#8220;uninterrupted&#8221; programming. As the Host, nothing is more inconvieent and frustrating than having to stop a yap fest with Jim Bovard for the WSJ Report or any other &#8220;words from our sponsors&#8221;. But such is the reality of Capitalism and commercial broadcasting.<br />
As Program Director,it goes w/o saying WSPD has to provide various programming elements to serve the audience during those vaccuous times Jim or Walter Williams or Tom DiLorenzo or similar guests aren&#8217;t'on with me. The audience is in dire need of the intel these guests provide &#8212; but commerical radio is a tough &#8220;classroom&#8221;. One almost has to trick the audience into learning the truth.<br />
While I am not an aplologist for the WSJ,I can tell you that the Front page and the Editorial page have little in common beyond who signs their paycheck. Stephen Moore,in charge of the fiscal oversight of the WSJ Editorial Dept and writer for their &#8220;Political Diary&#8221;, has been a personal friend since his days at Cato. Any common ground shared by the WSJ and the WSJ Editorial pages is purely coincidental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/#comment-120593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=849#comment-120593</guid>
		<description>You're welcome, Jim.

I hope one day Brian can have you on for a whole hour. 

There is a difference between the humor Brian and you show. You two are funny. The WSJ report is unintentionally funny, something that the editors wouldn't appreciate. In fact, I've seen stories in their A section that completely contradict the editorial on the same day. Either they don't care or they don't read their own paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Jim.</p>
<p>I hope one day Brian can have you on for a whole hour. </p>
<p>There is a difference between the humor Brian and you show. You two are funny. The WSJ report is unintentionally funny, something that the editors wouldn&#8217;t appreciate. In fact, I&#8217;ve seen stories in their A section that completely contradict the editorial on the same day. Either they don&#8217;t care or they don&#8217;t read their own paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/#comment-120590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=849#comment-120590</guid>
		<description>Ryan - thanks for listening.   I guess the WSJ "black humor" was a nice segue-way from Brian's and my twisted humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan - thanks for listening.   I guess the WSJ &#8220;black humor&#8221; was a nice segue-way from Brian&#8217;s and my twisted humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://jimbovard.com/blog/2009/04/23/listen-live-on-the-brian-wilson-show-today-423/#comment-120589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimbovard.com/blog/?p=849#comment-120589</guid>
		<description>Jim,

As usual, it was a good interview. I do have one complaint. It wasn't long enough, particularly to cut it short for Wall Street Journal Report which should come under the heading of black humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>As usual, it was a good interview. I do have one complaint. It wasn&#8217;t long enough, particularly to cut it short for Wall Street Journal Report which should come under the heading of black humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

