March 10, 1994, Thursday, FINAL EDITION
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 8A
LENGTH: 371 words
HEADLINE: Slash federal food aid
BYLINE: James Bovard
 BODY:
  If prostitutes offered free sex to needy men, the number of males claiming
  to be sex-starved would skyrocket overnight.
 If banks offered to hand out free $ 100 bills to struggling families, the
  number of people claiming financial stress would quintuple.
 The fact that 26 million people allegedly receive free food from private
  pantries and soup kitchens each month proves only that when free goods are
  USA TODAY, March 10, 1994 
  
  offered, demand will always exceed supply. It would be absurd to try to deduce
  from this cold, hard fact that the government must continue giving out more 
  free
  food under the Emergency Food Assistance Program.
 The hullabaloo over this program is especially ludicrous because its budget 
  -
  $ 80 million a year - accounts for less than 0.5% of federal food-assistance
  spending. The hunger-hysteria lobby has succeeded in turning an arcane budget
  issue into a transcendent moral issue, as if mass hunger must result from any
  reduction in any of the dozen federal food programs.
 If federal spending were the answer, hunger would have been abolished long
  ago. Federal food-assistance spending has increased over 100-fold since 1955 
  -
  yet the media report far more of a "hunger crisis" now than they did 
  back then. 
 The hunger-hysteria lobby never explains why federal handouts (which offer 
  to
  pay for up to eight meals a day per poor person) have not solved the hunger
  problem; instead, the lobbyists clamor ever louder for more handouts.
 The hunger-hysteria lobby has a long history of inventing misleading methods 
  
  to greatly exaggerate the number of hungry; in one study, a prominent
  organization assumed that any low-income person who did not get food stamps 
  must
  be hungry. But Agriculture Department studies show that many low-income
  USA TODAY, March 10, 1994 
  
  families who refuse to go on food stamp/welfare actually feed themselves better 
  
  than those who go on the dole.
 It is not surprising that lobbies would agitate for continued wasteful
  federal spending. What is surprising is that the news media continue to be a
  mindless conduit of any well-hyped concocted tale that floats across some
  editor's desk.
 How can we expect politicians to rein in the federal government if those in
  the news media refuse to rein in their naivete?