{"id":9091,"date":"2015-12-31T12:52:15","date_gmt":"2015-12-31T17:52:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/?p=9091"},"modified":"2015-12-31T12:52:15","modified_gmt":"2015-12-31T17:52:15","slug":"fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/","title":{"rendered":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511\"<\/a>From the Future of Freedom Foundation <\/a>– \"ffflogo\"<\/a>
\nSupreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket
\nby James Bovard<\/h4>\n

The December 2013 Future of Freedom contained my article \u201cA Supreme Rebuff for USDA\u2019s Ruinous Raisin Regime.\u201d The legal case surrounding that controversy kept percolating in the courts for another 18 months. The Obama administration won a big victory in federal appeals court last year before getting squashed by the Supreme Court this past June. The Supremes put an end to federal raisin racketeering, but private-property rights remain in political crosshairs across the nation.<\/p>\n

This case began in 2002, when the Agriculture Department\u2019s Raisin Administrative Committee prohibited producers from selling 47 percent of their raisin harvest in order to drive up raisin prices as part of a \u201creserve\u201d scheme. The following year, the Raisin Committee decreed that producers must forfeit 30 percent of their harvest to the Raisin Committee. Marvin and Laura Horne, raisin growers in Kerman, California, refused to submit, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) slapped them with more than $700,000 in fines. The Raisin Administrative Committee was empowered by a 1930s-era law that permitted seizing farmers\u2019 harvests to protect them from gluts.<\/p>\n

When the Supreme Court first heard this case in 2013, even liberal justices were amazed at the heavy-handed, archaic nature of the regulatory regime. During oral arguments, Justice Stephen Breyer declared, \u201cI can\u2019t believe that Congress wanted the taxpayers to pay for a program that\u2019s going to mean they have to pay higher prices as consumers.\u201d Justice Elena Kagan suggested that the statute authorizing the raisin cartel could be \u201cthe world\u2019s most outdated law.\u201d<\/p>\n

Perhaps inspired by Justice Kagan\u2019s quip, a Ninth Circuit federal Court of Appeals decision in May 2014 reached back a hundred years to justify perpetuating federal control of the raisin business. The decision declared, \u201cRaisin prices rose rapidly between 1914 and 1920, peaking in 1921 at $235 per ton. This surge in prices spurred increased production, which in turn caused prices to plummet back down to between $40 and $60 per ton.\u201d Crop prices skyrocketed during those years in large part because the World War I-era U.S. Food Administration cornered markets and vastly inflated demand by providing cheap credit to European allies to purchase boatloads of harvests. Federal intervention spurred a boom and bust that ravaged American farmers in the early 1920s.<\/p>\n

The Ninth Circuit decision quotes a 1943 Supreme Court ruling justifying regimenting raisin farmers because the industry became \u201ccompelled to sell at less than parity prices.\u201d But the parity index was concocted by government agricultural economists in the 1920s to justify federal aid to farmers. \u201cParity\u201d was based on a set ratio of farm prices to nonfarm prices, in correlation with the ratio that prevailed in 1910\u201314, a boom time for farmers. Because production costs for both farm and nonfarm goods radically changed, it never made any economic sense to rely on \u201cparity\u201d but it was a popular political ploy.<\/p>\n

The Ninth Circuit judges\u2019 curiosity seemingly never extended beyond reading USDA press releases. Their decision declared that \u201cthe Marketing Order ensures \u2018orderly\u2019 market conditions by regulating raisin supply.\u201d But the Raisin Committee\u2019s sweeping powers have failed to prevent vast swings in prices farmers receive. Many California farmers have shifted their land to other crops; the acreage devoted to raisin production has plunged since 2000. The Ninth Circuit effectively declared that a taking is not a taking if the government intends to benefit the victim, regardless of how much damage the government inflicts.<\/p>\n

The judges in the Court of Appeals played down the Hornes\u2019 losses because they involved only \u201cpersonal property\u201d \u2014 not \u201creal property,\u201d such as land. The decision stressed that the \u201cHornes did not lose all economically valuable use of their personal property,\u201d presumably because the feds did not take all their raisins.<\/p>\n

The judges noted that \u201cthe Hornes can avoid the reserve requirement \u2026 by planting different crops\u201d that are not subject to federally authorized commandeering. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia captured the reality far better when he said in oral arguments in March 2013 that the USDA in effect offers farmers a choice: \u201cYour raisins or your life.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cLet them sell wine.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Hornes appealed the ruling of the Court of Appeals, and the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to uphold the Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision. The Obama administration continually shifted its legal defense and claimed earlier this year that there are no \u201ctakings\u201d because of arcane paperwork shuffles regarding raisin ownership built into federal law. Apparently, federal action should not count as a seizure of property unless a SWAT team storms into the farm\u2019s packing shed and commandeers the raisins at gunpoint. The Justice Department also asserted that federal dictates do not violate raisin farmers\u2019 rights because they \u201ccan avoid the reserve requirement of the Marketing Order by \u2026 planting different crops\u201d or, presumably, by going to law school and becoming a federal lawyer who champions seizing farmers\u2019 crops.<\/p>\n

In the same way that the Obama administration denied that Obamacare would penalize individuals without health insurance, it is now claiming that the Agriculture Department\u2019s seizures of raisins do not harm farmers. The Justice Department\u2019s brief asserted that \u201cthe net effect of the reserve-pool requirement is to raise the value of a producer\u2019s raisins as a whole, by stabilizing the market price of raisins and increasing revenues from the sale\u201d of the remainder of the crop. But for that to be true, the regulatory scheme would have to double the price of raisins in some years.<\/p>\n

In its brief filed with the Supreme Court, the Obama administration claimed that the \u201cmarketing order\u2019s fair and proven measures for stabilizing the raisin market\u201d are overwhelmingly supported by raisin growers. However, the brief failed to disclose that the super-heavyweight of the raisin industry, Sun-Maid, formally requested on November 17 that the secretary of Agriculture end all volume controls on raisin sales. Sun-Maid, whose 650 farmers account for almost 30 percent of California raisin production, concluded that \u201cproducers will suffer economic harm\u201d from perpetuating archaic restrictions on marketing.<\/p>\n

The Agriculture Department\u2019s controls are sowing chaos. Sun-Maid points out that \u201cthere is no short-term or long-term predictability regarding the marketing of a [raisin] crop because of the potential volume regulation provisions. Producers have great difficulty in projecting potential future revenue,\u201d which makes it more difficult \u201cto obtain credit financing to cover production expenses.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the Supreme Court thwarted the Obama administration effort to redefine property rights into a meaningless vapor. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for an 8-1 majority, declared, \u201cThe Government contends that the reserve requirement is not a taking because raisin growers voluntarily choose to participate in the raisin market. According to the Government, if raisin growers don\u2019t like it, they can \u2018plant different crops,\u2019 or \u2018sell their raisin-variety grapes as table grapes or for use in juice or wine.\u2019 \u2018Let them sell wine\u2019 is probably not much more comforting to the raisin growers than similar retorts have been to others throughout history.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Obama administration claimed the raisin grab was justified because the farmers benefited from federal regulation of their industry. Roberts retorted, \u201cThe Government cites no support for its hypothetical-based approach, or its notion that general regulatory activity such as enforcement of quality standards can constitute just compensation for a specific physical taking.\u201d<\/p>\n

Roberts scoffed at the notion that the government deserved deference because it permitted farmers to sell their crops: \u201cSelling produce in interstate commerce \u2026 [is] not a special governmental benefit that the government may hold hostage, to be ransomed by the waiver of constitutional protection.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Obama administration, carrying water for the USDA, sought to throw a bureaucratic smokescreen over the Raisin Administrative Committee\u2019s processes, pretending that it did not actually commandeer the raisins. But Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, noted that the government committee \u201ctakes the raisins of citizens and, among other things, gives them away or sells them to exporters, foreign importers, and foreign governments.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court smashed the Obama administration\u2019s implication that the Fifth Amendment takings clause was meant only to protect land, not other property. Roberts declared, \u201cThe government has a categorical duty to pay just compensation when it takes your car, just as when it takes your home.\u201d The Obama team\u2019s attempt to effectively obliterate constitutional protection for the vast majority of property in the nation should have been far more controversial.<\/p>\n

The only justice who swallowed the administration\u2019s line was Sandra Sotomayor, who insisted that a taking occurs only \u201cwhere all property rights have been destroyed by governmental action\u2026. It is not a per se taking if it does not result in the destruction of every property right.\u201d Her standard would provide an engraved invitation for a vast increase of government ravaging.<\/p>\n

In response to the decision, Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network declared, \u201cThe Court struck a blow for all Americans today by tossing out the administration\u2019s nonsensical argument that it doesn\u2019t have to compensate people for seizing their personal property. That argument is well past its expiration date.\u201d<\/p>\n

After the Supremes announced their ruling, the Wall Street Journal reported that the USDA was \u201cstudying the Court\u2019s decision.\u201d A USDA spokesman declared, \u201cThe federal marketing order provides the industry in California with the ability to establish and modify handling regulations meant to improve global marketing opportunities for producers and handlers.\u201d Perhaps USDA bureaucrats mistakenly believed that they could appeal the Supreme Court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n

This article was originally published in the September 2015 edition of Future of Freedom.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From the Future of Freedom Foundation – Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket by James Bovard The December 2013 Future of Freedom contained my article \u201cA Supreme Rebuff for USDA\u2019s Ruinous Raisin Regime.\u201d The legal case surrounding that controversy kept percolating in the courts for another 18 months. The Obama administration won a big victory […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7903,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[149,415,451,213,794,45,532,152,164,383,38,165,241,369,486,14,170,24,660,384,153,151],"class_list":{"0":"post-9091","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"tag-agriculture","8":"tag-boondoggle","9":"tag-constitution","10":"tag-farm-subsidy","11":"tag-fifth-amendment","12":"tag-freedom","13":"tag-justice-department","14":"tag-lawsuit","15":"tag-leviathan","16":"tag-marketing-order","17":"tag-obama","18":"tag-paternalism","19":"tag-property-rights","20":"tag-property-rights-2","21":"tag-reform","22":"tag-rule-of-law","23":"tag-sovereign-immunity","24":"tag-supreme-court","26":"tag-takings","27":"tag-usda","28":"tag-waste"},"yoast_head":"\nFFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"From the Future of Freedom Foundation – Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket by James Bovard The December 2013 Future of Freedom contained my article \u201cA Supreme Rebuff for USDA\u2019s Ruinous Raisin Regime.\u201d The legal case surrounding that controversy kept percolating in the courts for another 18 months. The Obama administration won a big victory […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"James Bovard\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jim.bovard\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"877\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"511\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@jimbovard\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jim\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jim\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f\"},\"headline\":\"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1587,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/01\\\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Agriculture\",\"Boondoggle\",\"Constitution\",\"farm subsidy\",\"Fifth Amendment\",\"Freedom\",\"Justice Department\",\"lawsuit\",\"leviathan\",\"marketing order\",\"Obama\",\"paternalism\",\"property rights\",\"Property rights\",\"Reform\",\"Rule of Law\",\"Sovereign immunity\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Supreme Court\",\"takings\",\"usda\",\"Waste\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/\",\"name\":\"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/01\\\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/01\\\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/01\\\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg\",\"width\":877,\"height\":511},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/2015\\\/12\\\/31\\\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"James Bovard\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f\",\"name\":\"Jim\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r\",\"caption\":\"Jim\"},\"description\":\"Bovard's homepage is at http:\\\/\\\/www.jimbovard.com He can be contacted at jim@jimbovard.com James Bovard is the author of ten books. The Wall Street Journal called Bovard \\\"the roving inspector general of the modern state\\\" and Washington Post columnist George Will called him a \\\"one-man truth squad.\\\" His 1994 book, Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty, received the Free Press Association\u2019s Mencken Award as Book of the Year. His Terrorism & Tyranny won the Lysander Spooner \\\"Best Book on Liberty in 2003\\\" award. He received the Thomas Szasz Award for Civil Liberties work, awarded by the Center for Independent Thought and the Freedom Fund Award from the Firearms Civil Rights Defense Fund of the National Rifle Association. Bovard\u2019s writings have been publicly denounced by FBI director Louis Freeh, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Postmaster General, and the chiefs of the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as well as by many congressmen and other malcontents.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.jimbovard.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jim.bovard\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/jimbovard\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jimbovard.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard","og_description":"From the Future of Freedom Foundation – Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket by James Bovard The December 2013 Future of Freedom contained my article \u201cA Supreme Rebuff for USDA\u2019s Ruinous Raisin Regime.\u201d The legal case surrounding that controversy kept percolating in the courts for another 18 months. The Obama administration won a big victory […]","og_url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/","og_site_name":"James Bovard","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jim.bovard","article_published_time":"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":877,"height":511,"url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jim","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@jimbovard","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jim","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/"},"author":{"name":"Jim","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f"},"headline":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket","datePublished":"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/"},"wordCount":1587,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg","keywords":["Agriculture","Boondoggle","Constitution","farm subsidy","Fifth Amendment","Freedom","Justice Department","lawsuit","leviathan","marketing order","Obama","paternalism","property rights","Property rights","Reform","Rule of Law","Sovereign immunity","Supreme Court","Supreme Court","takings","usda","Waste"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/","url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/","name":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket - James Bovard","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg","datePublished":"2015-12-31T17:52:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/1_112015_bovar-calif-raisin-8201_s877x511.jpg","width":877,"height":511},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2015\/12\/31\/fff-supreme-demolition-for-the-raisin-racket\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FFF: Supreme Demolition for the Raisin Racket"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/","name":"James Bovard","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/79550830ad81c14be529a2c37469974f","name":"Jim","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d95466cfd0934e38803c5035629df727ae4ec1f3f96c6883c05b5c52e2044505?s=96&d=mm&r=r","caption":"Jim"},"description":"Bovard's homepage is at http:\/\/www.jimbovard.com He can be contacted at jim@jimbovard.com James Bovard is the author of ten books. The Wall Street Journal called Bovard \"the roving inspector general of the modern state\" and Washington Post columnist George Will called him a \"one-man truth squad.\" His 1994 book, Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty, received the Free Press Association\u2019s Mencken Award as Book of the Year. His Terrorism & Tyranny won the Lysander Spooner \"Best Book on Liberty in 2003\" award. He received the Thomas Szasz Award for Civil Liberties work, awarded by the Center for Independent Thought and the Freedom Fund Award from the Firearms Civil Rights Defense Fund of the National Rifle Association. Bovard\u2019s writings have been publicly denounced by FBI director Louis Freeh, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Postmaster General, and the chiefs of the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as well as by many congressmen and other malcontents.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.jimbovard.com","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jim.bovard","https:\/\/x.com\/jimbovard"],"url":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9091"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9091\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9092,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9091\/revisions\/9092"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}