New York Times Calls Me an “Anti-Czar Czar”
9:23 pm | Attention Deficit Democracy | Bovard
The New York Times’ Mark Leibovich has a zesty piece in Sunday’s Times, “The Tin-Star Title for the Too-Tough Job.” He starts out:
IN 19th-century Russia, Czar Nicolas I commissioned an official national anthem known as “God Save the Czar.”
In 21st-century Washington, the anthem would be more suitably titled “God Help the Czar.”
It’s not good to be the czar, not here, not now.
Leibovich called me on Thursday to chat about czars. Here are some of the comments:
“I don’t think any of the founding fathers looked to the Russian model,” said James Bovard, a libertarian writer and lecturer whose contemptuous essay in 2000, “Ten Thousand Czars,” made him something of an “anti-czar czar.” Mr. Bovard dismisses the appointment of General Lute as “the same old scam that politicians have used for a long time whenever there is a failing policy.”
…..
Mr. Bovard proposes that government czars at least get to wear special hats, “like something from Gilbert and Sullivan,” to make them feel special and to differentiate them from other federal officials.
****************
This is the first time - and the probably the only time - that I will ever be quoted making an opera reference.
I wasn’t able to think of a good bluegrass metaphor or analogy on the spur of that moment.
TrackBack
http://jimbovard.com/blog/2007/05/19/new-york-times-calls-me-an-anti-czar-czar/trackback/
Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post
Scott
Comment on Saturday 19th May 2007 @ 10:17 pm
Ha! Thing is about a job like that - it’ll exist as long as America does.
Second though, that might not be too long.
Brian Wilson
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 3:52 am
Every “czar” will be required to change his name to Peter.
He can only hang w/babes names Katherine.
In deference to today’s functional illiterates, he’ll get to drop the “c”.
Brian Wilson
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 3:56 am
“…contemptuous essay in 2000, “Ten Thousand Czars,…”
Dammit, Jim - at least he could have plugged “Attention Defcit Democracy” along w/a seven yr old essay!
We really need to work on marketing techniques.
Original Steve
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 4:02 am
I thought Czars were guys who ended up getting whacked.
Mace Price
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 8:33 am
…I promise y’all that before the laist dawgs hung this here General Lute, The Decider’s new “Iraq Czar” will prove just about as effective in bringing what amounts to the quicksand of US Military Occupation of Iraq to a favorable conclusion; as the former “Drug Czars” have been in bring the Century long “War on Drugs” to the same: Which is to say jest ’bout as effective as a one legged man in a rat stomp.
Jim
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 9:44 am
Steve - did I say anything about what should or should not happen to czars?
My silence should not be interpreted as a blanket pardon for all czars.
Jim
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 9:47 am
Brian - actually, that article was in part a spinoff from Freedom in Chains: The Rise of the State & the Demise of the Citizen (1999).
Seven or eight years seems to be about the usual lag time, visibility-wise….
Ryan
Comment on Sunday 20th May 2007 @ 11:07 am
Jim,
Here’s an anthem for our czars. I suggest we use “A Modern Major General” by Gilbert and Sullivan.
http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/iamtheve.htm
Kevin Carson
Comment on Wednesday 23rd May 2007 @ 10:14 pm
Yikes! I guess it really is a Tsarist-Occupied Government.
Leave a Comment
Basic HTML Tags are allowed. Comments are subject to moderation