Bill Clinton’s Lethal Hypocrisy on Government Violence

from Counterpunch today –
Bill Clinton on Violence and Government
A Lethal Hypocrisy

Yesterday, on the fifteenth anniversary of the attack on the federal office building in Oklahoma City, former President Bill Clinton had an op-ed in the New York Times headlined: “Violence is Unacceptable in a Democracy.” The article settles any doubts about whether Clinton was one of the most talented demagogues of modern times.

Casting a net of collective guilt over much of the 48 contiguous states, Clinton announced that the 1995 bombing was the fault of people who believed “that the greatest threat to American freedom is our government, and that public servants do not protect our freedoms, but abuse them.” People who distrusted government helped echo ideas which somehow persuaded “deeply alienated and disconnected Americans” to carry out the attack.

In other words, people who harshly criticize the government are guilty of – or at least complicit in – mass murder.

It would be difficult to contrive a storyline to better exonerate all government actions. We still know far too little about the actual facts of the Oklahoma City bombing. We do know that the perpetrators were guilty of a heinous crime and deserved the harshest punishment. But that is a topic for a different day.

Clinton declared that “we do not have the right to resort to violence — or the threat of violence — when we don’t get our way. “

Unless you’re the government.

The four million Americans arrested for marijuana violations during Clinton’s reign were victims of government violence and government threats of violence. The “fact” that Clinton never inhaled did not prevent the drug war from ravaging far more lives during his time in office. The number of people arrested for drug offenses rose by 73% between 1992 and 1997. The Clinton administration bankrolled the militarization of local police, sowing the seeds for a scourge of no-knock raids at wrong addresses and a massive increase in efforts to intimidate average citizens in big cities around the country.

During Clinton’s reign, the IRS seized over 12 million bank accounts, put liens on over 9 million people’s homes and land, directly confiscated more than 100,000 people’s houses, cars, or real property, and imposed over 100 million penalties on people for allegedly not paying sufficient taxes, paying taxes late, etc. The IRS knew that millions of citizens were assessed taxes and penalties that they did not owe. A 1997 audit of the IRS’s Arkansas-Oklahoma district found that a third of the property seizures carried out violated federal law or IRS regulations. Former IRS district chief David Patnoe observed in 1998: “More tax is collected by fear and intimidation than by the law.” The Clinton administration fought tooth and nail against a law Congress passed in 1998 to curtail IRS depredations against innocent Americans.

Clinton’s op-ed mentions, almost as an aside, that the Oklahoma City bombing occurred on the second anniversary of the final assault at Waco. In 1995, Clinton denounced the Branch Davidians as “murderers” for their response to the 1993 Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms attack on their home. Clinton used that label even though a Texas jury found no such guilt – and even though the BATF apparently shot first and did not have a proper warrant for its no-knock, military-style raid.

Clinton was commander-in-chief when the FBI 54-ton tanks smashed into the Davidians’ home, collapsing 25% of the ramshackle building on top of residents before a fire commenced that left 80 people dead. His administration did almost everything it could to cover up the details of federal action at Waco, spurring the widespread distrust which Clinton later denounced.

The federal raid in April 2000 to seize six year old Elian Gonzalez was Clinton-style non-violence at its best. The late-night surprise attack went as planned – nabbing the boy and leaving shattered doors, a broken bed, roughed-up Cuban-Americans and two NBC cameramen on the ground, writhing in pain from stomach-kicks or rifle-butts to the head. But a photographer caught the image of a souped-up Border Patrol agent pointing his submachine gun toward the terrified boy.

Clinton administration officials rushed to explain why the raid was practically a demonstration of Gandhi’s teachings in action. A few hours after the raid, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder asserted that the boy “was not taken at the point of a gun.” When challenged about the machine-gun photograph, Holder explained: “They were armed agents who went in there who acted very sensitively.” Attorney General Janet Reno stressed that the photo showed that agent’s “finger was not on the trigger.” Two days later, Reno declared, “One of the things that is so very important is that the force was not used. It was a show of force that prevented people from getting hurt.” By Reno’s standard, any bank robbery in which no one gets shot is merely a nonviolent exchange of bags of money. White House spokesman Joe Lockhart, responding to a question about the use of excessive force, stressed that the agents “drove up [to the Gonzalez house] in white mini-vans” – as if the vehicle’s color proved they were on a mission of mercy.

Clinton’s Iraq policy relied on systemic violence. The U.S. was the lead country in enforcing and perpetuating the blockade on Iraq that resulted in hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dying. U.S. planes carried out hundreds of bombing runs on Iraq, and volleys of American cruise missiles slammed his country during his reign.

Bill Clinton has often acted like his 78-day bombing assault on Serbia in 1999 was his finest hour. The State Department was referring to the Kosovo Liberation Army as a terrorist group until 1997. After Clinton decided to attack Serbia, the KLA officially became freedom fighters. The fact that both Serbs and ethnic Albanians were up to their elbows in atrocities was simply brushed aside or denied. After surviving a Senate impeachment trial, Clinton was hellbent on starring in an old-time morality play.

Clinton’s bombing campaign killed hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Serb civilians. From intentionally bombing a television station, Belgrade neighborhoods, power stations, bridges (regardless of the number of people on them at the time), to “accidentally” bombing a bus (killing 47 people), a passenger train, marketplaces, hospitals, apartment buildings, and the Chinese embassy, the rules of engagement for U.S. bombers guaranteed that many innocent people would be killed.

In his anniversary op-ed, Clinton declared that “without the law there is no freedom.” But the law did not stop, or even slow, Clinton from raining death on Belgrade. Clinton brazenly violated the War Powers Act, the 1973 law which required the president to get authorization from Congress for committing U.S. troops to any combat situation that lasted more than 60 days. The House of Representatives refused to endorse Clinton’s warring. But, on Serbia and many other issues, Clinton acted as if his moral mission exempted him from all restraints, legal and otherwise.

Clinton warned that “there is a big difference between criticizing a policy or a politician and demonizing the government that guarantees our freedoms and the public servants who enforce our laws.”

And who is to judge when criticizing turns into demonizing? The politicians themselves? Or perhaps the Department of Homeland Security, with its reports on the perils of “extremists” who believe in the Constitution and civil liberties? And then there is always the FBI, which views practically anyone who thinks Washington is full of crap as a dangerous extremist.

And what of the “public servants” who violate citizens’ rights, unjustifiably shoot or Taser them, fabricate evidence against them, or otherwise make their lives hell? What of the congressmen who vote in favor of laws that authorize torture or suspend habeas corpus? What of Justice Department lawyers who craft briefs proving why the president is a Czar?

Fifteen years after the Oklahoma City bombing, we must also remember the danger from politicians who place government above the law and above the people.

James Bovard is the author of Attention Deficit Democracy, The Bush Betrayal, Terrorism and Tyranny, and other books.


, , , , , ,

18 Responses to Bill Clinton’s Lethal Hypocrisy on Government Violence

  1. Robert April 20, 2010 at 11:47 pm #

    Mr. Bovard, I think you just — how do the internet kids say it? — PWNED Bill Clinton. Well done.

  2. Erwin Rysz April 21, 2010 at 5:29 am #

    Mr. Bouvard:
    You should also mention the witholding of Federal highway funds to the states – which was done to get them to accept lower dui standards. Now we have cops waiting outside the Olive garden and Red Lobster because the standrds are low enough to make EVERYONE who has one drink a possible criminal. Of course these same cops love the NEW and “improved” welfare state – which keeps the funding going.

    Perhaps one should ask why candice Lightner – the woman who founded MADD resigned.

  3. Jim H. April 21, 2010 at 8:02 am #

    Well done! I was disgusted by Slick Willy’s remarks likening political dissent to the 1995 bombing (that was retaliation for his administration’s policy of reckless violence against citizens).

  4. Spiff April 21, 2010 at 9:14 am #

    Damned well done article! Should be published in the Wall Street Journal…
    I have to wonder how much of the aid money going to Haiti is passing through Slick Willie’s and Howlin Hilary’s hands…

  5. Jay Davis April 21, 2010 at 10:52 am #

    And don’t forget Ruby Ridge! Randy Weaver’s wife was murdered by the FBI, but in the end, Weaver was only found guilty of “failure to appear”. And the FBI did such a good job of stonewalling, the State’s Attorney could not prosecute the FBI murderers. Mr. Clinton has done a lot to foster distrust of the federal government. I hope he sleeps well at night – the big hypocrite!

  6. alpowolf April 21, 2010 at 12:16 pm #

    What’s next from Bill? A lecture on the sanctity of marriage? Or how everybody should serve in the military? Wait, I have it: the importance of telling the truth.

  7. Jim April 21, 2010 at 12:34 pm #

    Alpowolf – Clinton should hire you as his ghostwriter. That’s a great idea!

  8. Fred April 21, 2010 at 1:17 pm #

    “Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill it teaches the whole people by its example.”

  9. maureen April 21, 2010 at 1:54 pm #

    Years ago…I checked one of the many “foundations” run by Clinton, which is now more often than not, Clinton-Bush. A very small percentage of the donations actually goes to those they “help”.

  10. Deuce April 21, 2010 at 3:21 pm #

    Bill Clinton, you got SERVED!

    Wow, way to cut the the bone on the hypocracy and false prophecy of this devout communist. Clinton and his ideals are a cancer on everything good about this country. He would have us be a police controlled welfare state where we all pray 3 times a day to his benevolent effigy if he could. That he claims to care about people, the well being of this nation, or anything resembling truth or goodness is a fraud. He is a chubby chasing, Marx reading, doublespeaking disgrace and a black mark on the history of this nation. One that we stil have yet to recover from.

  11. Orville H. Larson April 21, 2010 at 4:57 pm #

    A hearty “Well done!” to Bovard. He gives “Blow Job Bill” Clinton the comeuppance that cretin deserves.

    Clinton’s a member of the District of Corruption Establishment. As such, he considers himself above the law.

  12. Keith Allison April 21, 2010 at 11:33 pm #

    Couldn’t have said it better myself. As far as I’m concerned, the Clinton’s are little more than pimples on the posterior of mankind.

  13. bruce tantish April 22, 2010 at 5:18 am #

    great story well done
    clinton is a gd phoney

  14. Brenda Prather April 22, 2010 at 9:32 am #

    What an informative & reassuring article!! When I heard the comments made from Slick Willies’ own mouth…I wondered how he gets away w/forcing his useless opinion,ON ANYTHING, on the American people!!! Did my heart good to know I am not the only one that knows what a worthless slime he is & always has been!! Hey Bill…how ’bout keeping your opinions to yourself! You are a “former president” with a bad reputation! Now go into retirement like a good boy and be quiet!!

  15. Dirk W. Sabin April 22, 2010 at 4:18 pm #

    If only they could extract the chemical components of empathy, in its political manifestation and label it a controlled substance and we could consign these windbags to the purgatorial provinces of jail. When sentimentally rendered opinion is all that
    matters, you can count on the Eddie Haskells of the world to Rule while swimming in cash sent by the bushel- full by the endless supply of rubes the species creates, particularly in the idiots-fest of the vaunted “service economy”.


  1. Bill Clinton’s Lethal Hypocrisy on Government Violence | - April 21, 2010

    […] By JAMES BOVARD […]

  2. » Bill Clinton’s Hypocrisy; American Foreign Policy and the Israel Lobby - April 22, 2010

    […] Bovard on Bill Clinton’s Lethal Hypocrisy on Government Violence ….Clinton declared that “we do not have the right to resort to violence — or the threat […]

  3. . . . muttered the ogre » welcome, sinner! - April 27, 2010

    […] course, by “we” he meant “the rest of you”. Jim Bovard’s response to this obvious hypocrisy is the best I’ve seen so far. no […]